In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, February 23, 2018

12868 - After Tussle With Top Bureaucrat Over Denial of Rations, Delhi Govt Drops Aadhaar Link - The Wire



While Anshu Prakash claims the meeting was called to discuss advertisements, AAP said it was called to discuss denial of rations on 2.5 lakh cards in January. Data now reveals that number to be much higher, at around four lakh.

Credit: Reuters

New Delhi: In the wake of Delhi chief secretary Anshu Prakash’s complaint that he was abused and assaulted by Aam Aadmi Party MLAs at a meeting called at chief minister Arvind Kejriwal’s residence to discuss “the issue of difficulty in release of certain television advertisements relating to completion of three years of current government of Delhi”, the ruling party had contended that he was lying as the meeting had nothing to do with the issue of advertisements and had instead been called to discuss the public interest issue of denial of rations to 2.5 lakh card holders.

By evening, the Delhi government announced that Aadhaar identification would no longer be mandatory for the capital’s poor to access subsidised food through the public distribution system. “We decided today to put on hold the old decision to allow the distribution of ration through Aadhaar card. Therefore, it will go back to the old system for some time now. Aadhaar card will not be mandatory,” deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia told reporters.

Although the immediate backdrop for Sisodia’s announcement was the claim and counter-claim aired publicly by Prakash and AAP leaders over Tuesday’s incident at the secretariat, a statement issued by Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan and Satark Nagrik Sangathan underlined the gravity of the problem Delhi’s poor are facing because of Aadhaar.

The two organisations have been spearheading the campaign against denial of legal entitlements of rations to citizens since Aadhaar was introduced.

‘Much higher exclusions than 2.5 lakh’
“The Delhi government has not disclosed the source of data it relied on to arrive at the figure of 2.5 lakh families deprived of ration in January 2018 due to Aadhaar. The data available online show much higher levels of exclusions,” the statement said.

Pointing out that “Aadhaar based biometric authentication through Point of Sale (PoS) devices has been made mandatory in Delhi since January 2018 in order to access rations under the National Food Security Act,” it added that “introduction of PoS has led to large scale exclusions of the poorest from their monthly legal entitlement to food”.

DRRAA and SNS had also organised a public hearing on the issue earlier this month in which the testimony of several people denied rations due to problems with Aadhaar registration, linkage or with PoS machines, were presented.

“Many of the people who participated in the public hearing testified that they were not provided ration as their biometric authentication failed. Further, at the public hearing, it emerged that there are scores of people whose fingerprints do not even get recognised as human fingerprints as such and therefore, the process of authentication is not initiated. These people are neither reflected in the database of successful transactions, nor in the database of failed transactions,” the statement said.

‘No rations provided on four lakh cards in January 2018’
Giving a complete picture of the ration problem in Delhi, the statement said, “of the nearly 19.5 lakh ration cards in Delhi, the online transaction information (success or failure) is only available for about 15.5 lakh ration cards. This implies that four lakh ration card holders, despite being linked to Aadhaar and thereby by the government’s own admission being genuine beneficiaries, have not been able to procure their rations.”
At the public hearing, the statement said, it had also emerged that Aadhaar has enabled a new form of corruption in the Public Distribution System (PDS) which is allowing the ration shopkeepers to pilfer grains.

Charge, counter-charge
In his complaint to the north district of Delhi police, Prakash had stated that yesterday he was informed via  telephone around 8.45 pm by V.K. Jain, the adviser to the chief minister, that he had to reach Kejriwal’s residence by midnight to discuss the issue of the difficulties faced in release certain television advertisements related to the completion of three years of the current government in Delhi.

The chief secretary had further stated that on reaching the Kejriwal’s residence, he was led by the chief minister’s adviser to the front room where Kejriwal, deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia and around 11 MLAs were present. “The chief minister told me that persons present in the room were MLAs and they had come to ask him about government’s publicity programme on completion of three years,” he said in his complaint to the Deputy Commissioner of Police.

Prakash said, “I explained to them that the officers were bound by guidelines laid by Hon’ble Supreme Court and any advertisement to be released must be in consonance with the said guidelines.”

The MLAs, he then said, started shouting at him and abused him while blaming him and the bureaucracy for not doing enough for publicity. Subsequently, he complained that he was assaulted by MLA Amanatullah Khan, who was sitting besides him, and others.


While the chief secretary’s complaint maintains that the meeting was called to discuss the issue of advertisements, AAP spokesperson Saurabh Bharadwaj, as well as the MLAs accused of assault, have  claimed that the issue of advertisements was not on the agenda at all and that the problems faced by ration card holders were raised by the MLAs instead. They have claimed that Prakash had been called to discuss the same issue. Khan also said that that the meeting was called to discuss non-distribution of rations through doorstep delivery mechanism.