AADHAAR RELATED ARTICLES: 12826 - Shiv Sena slams BJP over PNB fraud case, asks why different rules for Nirav Modi -- India Today

In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.

On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.

In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.

In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.

In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.

"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi

Ram Krishnaswamy

Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, February 17, 2018

12826 - Shiv Sena slams BJP over PNB fraud case, asks why different rules for Nirav Modi -- India Today

Shiv Sena slams BJP over PNB fraud case, asks why different rules for Nirav Modi

Mayuresh Ganapatye
February 17, 2018

Sanjay Raut (Photo: Twitter/@rautsanjay61)

In an exclusive interview with India Today, Shiv Sena MP in Rajya Sabha, Sanjay Raut slammed the Modi government for Nirav Modi and the Punjab National Bank (PNB) scam.

Raut questioned immigration work of central agencies like Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

"How can Nirav Modi leave country and all these agencies were not even aware of it? What were other intelligence agencies doing?" asked Raut.

Raut feels that there are different set of rules for common people and different for fraudulent businessmen like Nirav Modi.

"Our accounts have been linked with Aadhaar so that government can monitor them. But what about these fraud people? What about their Aadhaar cards? How could these banks give such a huge loan?" he asked.

After Lalit Modi and Vijay Mallya, this is another massive fraud case which came to light. Where after, committing the fraud a culprit has fled the country. "If this took place under the Congress government, we would see a lot of uproar in country.

But it's our government, PM Modi's government. Modi gave mantra of 'na khaunga na khanedunga', but if this is the case then how are we going to face people in next elections?" said Raut.

Further explaining how this government discriminates between common man and fraud businessmen like Nirav Modi, Sanjay Raut said, "Couple of days ago, one farmer from Marathwada received a letter from bank for missing his EMI of Rs 2,000, but when this govt says that Rs 11,000 crore fraud is within control means this amount in crore is smaller than Rs 2000."

Raut also criticized the political nexus between such fraud businessmen and politicians. Raut said "There are hundreds of Nirav Modi who raise funds for political parties. We must investigate this thoroughly. With the help of such fraud businessmen people come and win the elections and enter politics. If we (Shiv Sena) had such Nirav Modis, we would have also won many elections. But Sena doesn't need such people."

Raut feels that "It is very easy to be a fraud in our country, go out and then from there, negotiate with our government to repay or return the very small amount. It's a clear case of corruption. Same thing Mallya did and now Nirav is doing.

"If we don't pay GST, VAT then we are not 'Desh Bhakt' but people like Nirav Modi are acclaimed citizens of this country who are roaming scot free after looting our own country." added Raut.

ALSO WATCH | From Nirav Modi to Vijay Mallya: A look at India's billionare'scamsters'