In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, November 27, 2011

2018 - Delhi VIPs plump for National Population Register- Business Standard

Sreelatha Menon / New Delhi November 27, 2011, 0:31 IST
Enrol with it, even as UIDAI gets more money to collect data.


The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) and the National Population Register (NPR), under the home ministry, may be slugging it out for the right to collect data for UID numbers across the country, but the very important people in the capital, look distinctly inclined towards NPR. The likes of Home Minister P Chidambaram, Finance Minister Pranab Mukherji have already enrolled themselves with the National Population Register for unique identity numbers.


NPR has also proved to be quicker in the draw by getting to Rahul Gandhi to scan his iris and thumb, while UIDAI, well, still twiddles its thumbs.


The home ministry has maintained that the NPR data alone is reliable and the UIDAI should stick to allotment of numbers to those enrolled, rather than getting into enrolment and biometric iris-mapping. So far, UIDAI has been allowed to enrol (in other words, collect data and scan thumbs and irises) a sample population of 200 million, while it has been seeking permission to enrol the country’s entire population. It has claimed it can do this by 2017.


Both NPR and UIDAI have been working on enrolments simultaneously in many parts of the country, including the capital. In the New Delhi Municipal Corporation area, where all the political VIPs live, NPR has almost completed its second round of operations. The first was done during the census.


The VIPs don’t seem to be in two minds over which of the two should be their enrolling authority. Most of them have already been mapped by NPR for biometric and iris data.


Some, including Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia, have not found time yet and are still being approached. The latter has been in favour of UIDAI being allowed to do the entire work and share data with NPR, rather than vice versa. However, the Planning Commission has also been at the forefront of raising questions over the cost of duplication of work, besides the necessity to scan irises.


Congress President Sonia Gandhi has also not been scanned for biometric and iris data, as she was in the US when the enrolment was done.
Senior BJP leader L K Advani, another of those yet to be enrolled, was likely to be available for iris and thumb scans this week, sources said.


A Cabinet Committee on UIDAI is expected to take a final decision on who would ultimately collect data for the whole country before UID numbers are given by UIDAI.


A proposal by Montek Singh Ahluwalia that UIDAI be allowed to do the biometric scan, or that NPR change its rules to accept data collected by UID, is before Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. 


Home Minister P Chidambaram this week wrote to the prime minister, saying using data collected through UIDAI was not reliable and could hurt security interests. A senior UIDAI official said the authority was also doing enrolment in the NDMC area, but it did not know who were included, as the Delhi government was assigned the job as its registrar. ‘We don’t know who is covered by UID there,’ the official said.
CLICK ON TITLE TO SEE ORIGINAL ARTICLE - Posted by
Labels: , ,