In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

1775 - Uniform know-your-customer likely for entire financial sector - Business Standard

N Sundaresha Subramanian & Palak Shah / Mumbai November 09, 2011, 0:09 IST

Soon, you may be able to buy mutual fund units, shares, insurance policies, bank deposits and other such financial products with a single Know Your Customer (KYC) compliance.

Financial Intelligence Unit-India (FIU-Ind), the national agency monitoring suspect financial transactions, has initiated discussions with different financial sector regulators to build a common database, which could be utilised by all financial services agencies.

On the sidelines of a conference, P K Tiwari, director, FIU-India, said: “The recent move by the capital market regulator, providing a common KYC for all securities market products, is a good initiative. It should be expanded across all other segments of the market.”

At present, each sectoral regulators -- the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority, the Reserve Bank of India, Pension Funds Regulatory and Development Authority and the Forward Markets Commission have different KYC requirements. This means users are now required to fill in numerous columns in multiple forms every time they buy a new product.

"How many cards am I supposed to carry? In countries like Hong Kong, there is only one. It serves all the different purposes. But here we have PAN, TIN and UID. Each agency wants to promote its own product as the valid proof, creating duplication. If this could be avoided, it is welcome," said a chief compliance officer of a public sector bank.

Also, the data is collected and stored separately, thereby not giving a complete picture of a client's financial history to the intermediaries. This affects the quality of suspicious transactions' reports sent by these entities to the FIU.

“If there is a common repository, the principal officers would be able to access and check the client’s transactions in other regulatory domains. This will enable us to form and relay a more informed opinion to FIU,” said John Mathews, senior vice-president and head of client services, HDFC AMC. He said the system introduced by Sebi, to take effect from January 1, would be a good model.

In July, Sebi said the initial KYC would be undertaken only once for capital market products like mutual funds, shares, etc. It proposed a mechanism wherein one or more regulated KYC Registration Agency (KRA) would undertake a KYC exercise at the stage of account opening for all clients.

The benefits of a KRA system include the execution of a single and uniform KYC procedure across the securities market, saving of record-keeping space, a centralised storage and dissemination of data. Specific criteria and rules to identify 'beneficial ownership' is being worked out jointly by Sebi and a committee set up by the finance ministry.

It will also help in saving time and burden of procedures for clients, by undertaking the KYC procedure of identification only once, subject to periodic update.

This common KYC database will help the different regulators and intermediaries monitor suspicious transactions and terrorist financing more efficiently, experts said. However, there are some practical difficulties. Vikas Tandon, director-anti money laundering, South Asia, Citibank, said the financial inclusion objective of the government should also be kept in mind. "In capital markets, the PAN (income tax identification) has been accepted as the universal proof and made mandatory. However, in other areas this may not be possible. For example, banks have the obligation of financial inclusion. Such differences need to be addressed."

Indian financial institutions are expected to spend $1 billion (Rs 4,900 crore) in the next few years to strengthen the systems and processes for anti-money laundering measures. According to a study by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, the estimated money laundering flow globally is close to $1.6 trillion, about 2.7 per cent of global GDP.

Though there is no specific data available for India, experts estimate the amount of money laundering to be one to two per cent of domestic GDP. "There are high levels of suspicious transactions. India is now doing what Singapore and Malaysia had done a few years before in implementing strong AML measures," said Mr Ian Selbie, solutions programme director for the Asia-Pacific at Unisys, a firm specialising in anti-money laundering and anti-fraud measures.

The financial industry will have to spend close to $100 million in installing the necessary software and together with training and other process, the required expenditure will be at least $1 billio