In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, January 8, 2012

2191 - Montek defends UIDAI project over smart cards - Business Standard

BS Reporter / New Delhi January 8, 2012, 0:52 IST


The rift between Planning Commission and Home Ministry over the Unique Identification Authority Project widened today with deputy chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia today contending that the UIDAI is better project than the one being advocated by the Home Ministry for capturing data regarding residents and improving the delivery of the government schemes. "We have suggested that what Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) is doing is actually better (than the proposal of issuing smart cards)," Plan panel Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia told reporters on the sidelines of the North-East Business Summit.

Home Minister P Chidambaram had earlier said that “the data collected by multiple registrars of the UIDAI does not meet the degree of assurance required under the NPR from the point of view of internal security, instead a chip-based smart card should be issued to all residents on the basis of record maintained by the National Population Register (NPR) — a digital data base currently under preparation.

The Planning Commission is believed to have scuttled the Home Ministry's suggestion.

Under the UIDAI, Ahluwalia said, "All the details are centrally stored and you identify the person with (unique) identity number through any secured mobile telephone connection".

The Planning Commission was initially critical of the UIDAI project increasing its mandate from the existing 202 million aadhar numbers to the entire population of 1.2 billion and also duplication of work with the home ministry run National Population Registrar.

However, it toned down its opposition after deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia firmly backed the project saying that firmly supported Nilekani's proposal and will settle all issues related to duplication of work and funds in time.

"There is a big difference between the technology UIDAI is using which is based on the identity number and you will actually have online authentication. You don't have to swipe the card to authenticate yourself," Ahluwalia said.

He further said whatever money has been sought for UIDAI will be realised in the form of increased efficiency.
"... If you want a platform to improve the efficiency of government schemes' delivery that money is well worth it," he said.

On duplication of work and extra burden on exchequer, Ahluwalia said, "I am not responsible for NPR. UIDAI money, I know what it is. It is well worth it...The way UIDAI is doing it, is the right way to do it."

Unlike the Home Ministry's proposal, he said, "(In UIDAI system) you don't have to swipe the card to authenticate yourself. Smart card technology is that... It can only be read by someone who actually has a card reading device."

On the fate of both the proposals, Ahluwalia said, "This will go to the EFC (Expenditure Finance Committee) and it will take a combined view. They (Home Ministry) must have given their comments."

Asked about why the Commission is so critical about the NPR project, he said, "On every project, we often raise issues. This is the job of the Planning Commission to criticize every proposal. This is constructive...Way."

UIDAI was mandated to issue 200 million Aadhaar numbers or national identity cards to residents by the end of this fiscal. Now Since the UIDAI is about the complete the mandated task, the Commission wants more resources for the authority for continuation of its work and cover remaining residents. EoM