In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, January 23, 2012

2241 - Stage set for PC-Montek face-off on UID project Read more:

By AMAN SHARMA

Last updated at 10:40 PM on 21st January 2012


It will be the Unique Identification Authority of India's (UIDAI) 'speed' versus the National Population Register's (NPR) 'fool-proof security'.
 

All eyes will be on home minister P. Chidambaram and Planning Commission deputy chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia as they take their turf war before the Union Cabinet next week.




Before this crucial Cabinet meeting, expected on Wednesday, the home minister on Saturday visited Tamil Nadu and the Andaman & Nicobar Islands to distribute the first tranche of resident identity cards to the citizens living in the coastal areas.



The home ministry has prepared five lakh resident identity cards after collecting biometrics of one crore people in coastal villages of nine states and four Union territories as part of the initial phase of NPR.
The NPR project will now be rolled out at the national level at a cost of `6,649 crore. Under the project, all residents of India above 18 years of age will get resident identity cards after the Registrar General of India (RGI) collects their biometric data.
The home ministry is engaged in a turf war with UIDAI headed by Nandan Nilekani, which has the backing of Montek, over the collection of biometrics. The options before the Cabinet are either to allow both the UID and RGI to collect biometric data or mandate only the UIDAI to collect biometric data and share it later with the RGI to generate resident identity cards.
The 'turf war' heated up with home secretary R.K. Singh's letter to cabinet secretary Ajit Seth on January 16.
'The home minister has desired that the matter may be taken to the Cabinet at the earliest for a clear cut direction on whether the resident identity card, which is being implemented in the coastal areas, should be rolled out on a national level. A clear decision is needed as to which organisation will carry out the biometric collection in the field,' Singh wrote.



To counter the home ministry, the Planning Commission will move a note before the Cabinet, stressing on the 'speed' of the UIDIA to justify it being allowed to collect biometrics from all residents of India above five years of age.


The plan panel's note will point out that the biometrics of 18 crore people have been captured and 12 crore UID numbers issued already. So roughly, the UIDAI has already issued numbers to nearly 10 per cent of India's population.
Montek will also contend that UID can capture biometrics of 10 lakh people daily, and can issue as many as one crore Aadhaar numbers every month. In comparison, the RGI has captured biometrics of roughly one crore people until now.
The home ministry's note, on the other hand, focuses on the security aspect of the NPR project. The ministry will stress that the UIDIA has hired multiple private registrars to collect biometric data. But under the NPR project, a consortium of central public sector undertakings - comprising Bharat Electronics Limited, Electronics Corporation of India Limited and Indian Telephone Industries Limited - is capturing the biometrics and producing the identity cards at secure premises.
'Data collected by multi-registrars of UID does not meet degree of assurance required from point of view of internal security,' the home secretary pointed out.
The home ministry note will also point out the 'flawed security mechanism' of UID where a resident who does not have any document to prove his identity can still get himself enrolled through an 'introducer'.

Such introducers, the MHA will point out, are simply private individuals registered by the UIDAI registrars themselves, such as their employees, members of local administrative bodies, postmen, teachers, doctors, anganwadi workers or even representatives of local NGOs.
The MHA note will stress that this mechanism seriously compromises national security as an anti-national element can get a UID number without having any proof of identity or address. Plan panel prepares note