In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, January 19, 2012

2209 - Clouds of uncertainity over Aadhaar - Deccan Herald

Clouds of uncertainity over Aadhaar


Clouds of uncertainity over Aadhaar
Bangalore, Jan 12, DHNS:

Only 23 pc of State’s population enrolled; firms reluctant to open new centres

 


With uncertainty plaguing the Unique Identity (UID) project, the enrolment process under the Centre's ambitious project to provide unique identity number or Aadhaar number to all, has been hit hard in the State.

Against the target of two crore enrolments by December 2011, the State e-governance department has been able to enroll only about 1.26 crore. The department was aiming at 80 per cent coverage by mid-2012, but so far it has enrolled just about 23 per cent of the State's population. Aadhaar number has been issued to about 74 lakh people across the State, official sources said.

The UID project is in limbo as serious concerns have been raised about its security features. The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finances in its report recently, rejected the biometric data-based identification (UID is based on biometric bata). The committee criticised the UID as a directionless project and recommended the government to re-consider it.

Of the 23 districts where the project has been launched in the State, enrolment is less than 10 per cent in about eight. Shimoga has recorded the lowest enrolment with 1.14 per cent, followed by Davanagere with 1.92 per cent. The highest enrolment is in Tumkur (95.06 per cent), where the pilot project was implemented in 2010. In Bangalore, it is 15 per cent.

The project was launched in Karnataka in August 2011, and the State e-governance department has been the nodal agency to implement it. Four private companies - Wipro, Integra, Glodin and Terasoft - were entrusted to enroll people under the project.

Though the project took off with much fanfare, the enthusiasm faded with doubts being raised on its fate. The companies (also called operators) have refused to step up the pace of the enrolment process by opening more centres. They fear they would incur heavy loss if the government winds up the project and terminates their contract. Presently, about 2,729 centres are functioning in the State.

For instance, the e-governance department had directed the companies to open about 1,000 enrolment centres in Bangalore city by November 2011 and implement the enrolment process in full swing. But the companies are not ready to open new centres. Presently, Bangalore city has only 335 enrolment centres.

Sources said some companies had informed the department they would speed up the process only if the department gave an assurance in writing that the contract would not be terminated midway. The department, as a result, has not been able to take any action against them, sources pointed out.

When contacted, D S Ravindran, Chief Executive Officer, Centre of e-governance, refused to comment on the companies not eager to speed up the enrolment process. He, however, said all the companies were implementing the project and the enrolment process would pick up in the coming days.

Progress card

* Enrolment less than 10 pc in eight dists
* Shimoga records lowest figure at 1.14 pc
* Highest enrolment in Tumkur at 95.06 pc
* Bangalore has 14 pc enrolment
* Companies want govt to give in writing that contract won’t be terminated