In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, August 15, 2013

4457 - Stop enrolment shivir of illegitimate and illegal biometric UID/Aadhaar number for media persons in public interest

From: Gopal Krishna <krishnagreen@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 12:34:17 +0530

Subject: [Arkitect India] Stop enrolment shivir of illegitimate and
illegal biometric UID/Aadhaar number for media persons in public
interest [9 Attachments]
To:
Hon'ble Chairman,
Press Council of India (PCI),
Soochna Bhavan,
Lodhi Road,
New Delhi-110003

Hon'ble Members
PCI
New Delhi

Subject- Stop enrolment shivir of illegitimate and illegal biometric
UID/Aadhaar number for media persons in public interest

Sir,

This is to seek your urgent intervention to stop the proposed enrolment
shivir for biometric Unique Identification (UID)/Aadhaar number for media
persons, we wish to seek immediate intervention to stop enrolment of
UID/Aadhaar number in public interest. This initiative is unethical and
violates the code of ethics for journalists.

On behalf of Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL), we wish to inform
you about our shock and disbelief at the plan of Delhi Journalists
Association (DJA) and Indraprastha Press Club of India with support from
the Indian Medical Association (IMA) to organise a shivir for media people
to enrol for biometric Unique Identification (UID)/Aadhaar number which is
illegitimate and illegal.

We submit that IMA's support for an exercise like biometric identification
is akin to German Medical Association's decision to support medical
atrocities committed during the 1930s and 1940s while under Nazi rule for
which they have apologized after 75 years. IMA may have to regret in the
same way. ( Reference: The Lancet, Volume 380, Issue 9852, Page 1472, 27
October 2012)

We submit that Dr Mohan Rao, Professor at the Centre of Social Medicine and
Community Health, Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) has underlined that
"the claim that the Unique Identification project will facilitate the
delivery of basic health services is dishonest."
www.frontline.in/static/html/fl2824/stories/20111202282401900.htm

It is noteworthy that aadhaar/UID is a biometric identifier number of 12
digits and not a card. Such schemes have been abandoned by countries like
Australia, UK, France and China because it raised concerns about
indiscriminate surveillance.

We submit that history is testimony to misuse of such systems by despotic
forces. German rulers used IBM Hollerith D-11 card sorting machine in the
census of the country in 1933 and since there was a provision for
identifying race and ethnicity, the Nazi rulers with the help of IBM could
conveniently count and identify the Jews whom they savagely butchered out
of racial hatred. One, therefore, cannot rule out the possibility of this
power being misused by persons in power to access private details such as
religious, racial, caste or even political profiling from Aadhaar data base
to serve undemocratic, illegal and unethical purposes for use in ways that
may pose a risk to the life or security of the person concerned. It is
noteworthy that when quizzed on how they would prevent Aadhaar data base
from falling in wrong hands or enabling unscrupulous politicians to misuse
for their benefit and against the interest of the Indian people, Nandan
Nilakeni who eulogizes Aadhaar number as “ubiquitous” and even advised
people to “tattoo it somewhere,” lest they should forget it, was caught
napping.”

We submit that it is admitted that Governments of France and South Korea
and transnational companies like Gemalto, IBM, L-1 Identity Solutions,
Microsoft and Pfizer are part of the World Bank’s eTransform Initiative
(ETI).

We submit that what is least talked about is that the E-identity and
UID/aadhaar related projects are part of World Bank's eTransform
Initiativeformally launched on April 23, 2010 and Interpol's
e-identity database project. This along with the then Union Finance Minister, Pranab Mukherjee's announcement in January 2011 for voluntarily seeking
fullfledged  Financial Sector Assessment Programme by IMF and the
WorldBank merits attention of the legislatures. In April, 2010 L-1
Identity Solutions Inc. (which has now been purchased by biometric technology
company Safran group), a French corporation signed a Memorandum of
Understanding (MoU) with the World Bank as part of the launch of the
initiative at a World Bank Spring Meeting event attended by many developing
country Ministers of Finance and Communications. It claimed that this
collaborative relationship with the World Bank is meant to improve the way
governments in developing countries deliver services to citizens as part of
the launch of the World Bank eTransform Initiative (ETI). The World Bank's
ETI seeks to leverage Information and Communication Technology (ICT) to
build a knowledge sharing network that helps governments of developing
nations to leverage the best practices of practitioners like L-1 and others
to improve the delivery of social and economic services. The knowledge
sharing network will focus on areas such as electronic Identification
(eID), e-Procurement, e-Health and e-Education; areas vital to promoting
the participation of citizens in democratic processes, such as voting, and
helping undocumented citizens get access to health and welfare programmes.
The World Bank is currently funding 14 projects related to e-government and
e-ID around the world. Are citizens supposed to believe that the World Bank
Group is working to ensure that India's national interest and its citizens'
rights are protected?

It must be noted that Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance has
rejected the National Identification Authority of India Bill 2010 which was
meant to give legal status to Unique Identification Authority of India
(UIDAI) in its report to the Parliament dated December 13, 2011. The report
is available at 164.100.47.134/lsscommittee/Finance/42%20Report.pdf.

In November, 2012 a Supreme Court bench of Chief Justice and Justice J
Chelameshwar issued notices to Ministry of Finance, Planning Commission and
the UIDAI on a PIL by a retired judge of Karnataka High Court K S
Puttaswamy who said the government was bypassing Parliament by going ahead
with  the distribution of UID numbers. The PIL has relied on the letter
sent to Prime Minister by Justice Rama Jois, former Supreme Court judge and
member of Rajya Sabha questioning the legality of UIDAI.

We submit that a coalition of people who have become beneficiaries in the
possible profits from biometric database have taken media persons for a
ride. It may be noted that publications like The Statesman, Tehelka, The
Hindu, Hard News, Samayantar, Teesari Duniya, Frontline, Rediff.com,
Samkalin Tapman, Chauthi Duniya, Public Agenda, Prabhat Khabar and Pratham Pravakata under Shri Ram Bahadur Rai have attempted to expose this
coalition.

We submit that there has been instances where 3.57 crore signatures against
Aadhaar/UID were submitted to the Prime Minister referring to the
implementation of UID/Aadhaar as ‘subversion of democracy’.

In a significant development following rigorous deliberations, an Indian
development support organization founded in 1960, Indo-Global Social
Service Society (IGSSS) has disassociated itself from UID Number project
which was being undertaken under Mission Convergence in Delhi.
Withdrawal of IGSSS that works in 21 states of the country across four core
areas India: Sustainable Livelihood, Youth Development, Disaster Risk
Reduction, and Urban Poverty merits the attention of all the states and
civil society organisations especially those who are unwittingly involved
in the UID Number enrolment process.

In its withdrawal letter IGSSS said, “we will not be able to continue to do
UID enrolment, as we discussed in the meeting of 10th May 2011.” It added,
it is taking step because `it’s hosted under the rubric of UNDP’s *“Innovation
Support for Social Protection:** **Institutionalizing Conditional Cash
Transfers**“** [Award ID: 00049804, Project: 00061073; Confer: Output 1,
Target 1.2 (a) & Output 3 (a), (b)]*. In fact we had no clue of this until
recently when we searched the web and got this information.’

It is clear that both Mission Convergence and UIDAI have been hiding these
crucial facts with ulterior motives. The letter reads, “IGSSS like many
other leading civil society groups and individuals are opposed to
conditional cash transfers and the UID will be used to dictate it.”

We wish to inform you as to why all Freedom Loving Indians should oppose
UID/ Aadhaar, National Population Register (NPR), National Intelligence
Grid (NATGRID) and National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC)?

They do so because:
It is a threat to privacy, civil liberties, federalism, national security,
sovereignty and constitution
It is without democratic, parliamentary, legal and constitutional sanction
It facilitates emergence of a Database, Surveillance State and Property
based Democracy
It is anti-poor and anti-citizen as it dismantles Public Distribution
System and other existing social service entitlements
It promotes outsourcing of governance
It is fraught with dangers of genocide and communal crisis
It is guided by undemocratic international financial institutions and
defence policies of other nuclear weapon holding countries
The collection of biometric data is an act violation of human rights and
turns citizens into subjects and treats them worse than prisoners.
There is an imminent danger from biometric technology companies
indiscriminately collecting biometric data like finger print, iris scan
It compromises citizens’ rights of present and future generations
It is a boondoggle, an unnecessary and wasteful project for citizens as it
transfers public money to private parties

Taking cognisance of the uncalled for linking of employees provident fund
with UID being opposed by the trade Unions, the report of Parliamentary
Standing Committee (PSC) on Finance that rejected the National
Identification Authority of India (NIDAI) Bill, 2010 for giving post dated
legal mandate to Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI);

Recalling the Statement of Concern on Unique Identification (UID) Number/
Aadhaar Number project and its inter-linkages with the proposed
legislations and institutional machinery issued by 17 eminent citizens like
Justice VR Krishna Iyer, Prof Romila Thapar, Late K.G.Kannabiran, Kavita
Srivastava, Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey, Late S.R.Sankaran, Deep Joshi, Prof.
Upendra Baxi, Prof. Uma Chakravarthi, Shohini Ghosh, Amar Kanwar, Bezwada Wilson, Trilochan Sastry, Prof. Jagdish Chhokar, Shabnam Hashmi and Justice A.P.Shah dated September 28, 2011 seeking halting of the project;

The Statement of Concern is available at

We wish to draw your attention towards the article by Shri Arun Jaitley,
Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha made available in Urdu, Gujarati, Hindi
and English that raises grave concerns about UID/aadhaar. The article is
at:

We wish to draw your attention towards 'Why the UID project poses a danger
to our sovereignty' available at
*
*We wish to submit that 'Legislatures fail to save citizens from their
biometric profiling by World Bank Group and its partners' (
*)
*
We wish to draw your attention criticism of DJA, IPCI असंवैधानिक और
अलोकतांत्रिक आधार कार्ड बनवाने के लिए शिविर लगातीं कूपमंडूक पत्रकार
यूनियनें at* *
** *
We wish to share how biometric UID/Aadhaar entails "नागरिक की निजता पर सबसे
बड़ा डाका"
*

*Kindly find attached the notification appointing NN, Chairman, Infosys Ltd
as Chairman UIDAI, the RTI reply refusing information about UID enrolment
of Prime Minister, cabinet ministers and others, RTI reply denying
information about the contracts given to foreign companies that work with
intelligence agencies of France and USA and World Bank Policy paper 'Use of
biometric technology in developing countries'. Central Information
Commission is seized with the issue of denial of information and had heard
the matter on June 24, 2013.
*
*We demand immediate audit of the activities of the UID Authority of India
since January 2009 till date;

We recommend to all the State governments, government departments and
voluntary organisations to boycott the UID related projects with immediate
effect.

We will be happy to share all the relevant documents in this regard. The
report of the Parliamentary Committee is attached and other relevant
documents in English and Hindi attached for your perusal and consideration.

We demand that enrolment shivir of illegitimate, illegal and questionable
scheme like biometric UID/Aadhaar number for media persons in public
interest.

thanks & regards
Gopal Krishna
Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL)
Mb: 09818089660

Cc
Office bearers and members of Indian Journalists Union (IJU)

Office bearers and members of Indian Medical association (IMA)

Office bearers and members of NUJ

Office bearers and members of DJA

2013/8/2 Palash Biswas <palashbiswaskl@gmail.com>

दिल्ली के मीडियाकर्मियों के लिए आधार कार्ड और वोटर कार्ड बनवाने हेतु शिविर[
Created on Friday, 02 August 2013 17:18 Written by B4M
दिल्ली जर्नलिस्ट्स एसोसिएशन (डीजेए) और इंद्रप्रस्थ प्रेस क्लब आफ इंडिया
(आईपीसी) इंडियन मेडिकल एसोसिएशन (आईएमए) के सहयोग से 4 और 5 अगस्त, 2013
(रविवार और सोमवार) को मीडियाकर्मियों के लिए आधार कार्ड और मतदाता पहचान पत्र
बनाने हेतु एक शिविर का आयोजन कर रहा है. यह शिविर आइटीओ स्थित इंडियन मेडिकल
एसोसिएशन के मुख्यालय में दोनों दिन सुबह दस बजे से शाम पांच बजे तक लगाया
जाएगा.