In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

4533 - 'Anna Bhagya' stumbles on poor PDS delivery - New Indian Express



By Prabhu Mallikarjunan - BANGALORE
Published: 26th August 2013 10:49 AM
Last Updated: 26th August 2013 10:49 AM

  • A random check by Express at FPS in Bangalore Urban indicates that a whopping 60 to 70 per cent of the beneficiaries have not got their Rs 1 a kg rice quota. | EPS file photo 
The Congress’ flagship Anna Bhagya scheme to give rice at Rs 1 a kg, listed as Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s biggest achievement in the last 100 days, has not reached many beneficiaries in the state, if the Bangalore figures are any indication.

Ineffective procurement, distribution and storage of foodgrains at fair price shops (FPS) and wholesale distribution centres has ensured the poor have not got what was promised to them.

State-wide figures on how much rice was lifted in July-August are not available even with the Department of Food and Civil Supplies, but a random check by Express at FPS in Bangalore Urban indicates that a whopping 60 to 70 per cent of the beneficiaries have not got their Rs 1 a kg rice quota.

Kumaraswamy (name changed), 61, an apartment guard and BPL card-holder, went to Fair Price Shop No 81 at Ramamurthy Nagar here thrice last month to collect the 30 kg of rice due to him under the scheme.

He told Express: “My efforts were in vain as the shop remained closed on all my visits. The notice board had no contact information. When I finally met the shop owner, I was asked to present my Aadhaar card to be eligible for the scheme. I do not have one, so I returned empty-handed.”

Officially, the only eligibility needed to get rice under this scheme is the BPL card.

In another incident, the store clerk at FPS No 75 at Siddapura on Whitefield Road here informed a customer that the shop will remain open only from Friday to Sunday as stock was not available throughout the week.

According to norms, the FPS should remain open on all days between 8 am and 12 pm and 4 pm and 8 pm, except Tuesdays.

A random check of the real-time data of two centres in Bangalore also revealed the poor reach of the scheme.

Though the scheme was launched on July 10, according to the Food and Civil Supplies Department’s data for July, only 599 people received 30 kg rice at Bangalore Central Okalipuram depot (FPS No 39), while the remaining 1,787 BPL card-holders had no access to the grains. This works out to about 30 per cent supply.

At FPS No 92 under Bangalore South Tilak Nagar depot, stocks were sufficient for only 1,163 people. The number of BPL card-holders under its purview are double the figure.

At the other centres in Chikmagalur, Tumkur, Gulbarga and Mysore, where data was tested real-time, information itself was not available online. The data was not updated in the correct format. Food and Civil Supplies commissioner Harsh Gupta accepted that the distribution system was ineffective, but said officials were in the process of reviving it. “The PDS had problems even before the scheme was implemented. This cannot be tackled in isolation and it takes time.

By October-end, we will try to set things right. Customers can be assured that the stocks will be picked up before the 10th of every month and available for distribution,” Food and Civil Supplies commissioner Harsh Gupta said.

The Okalipuram and Tilak Nagar data, he said, “could be a discrepancy in the data as not many customers have biometric cards. The data reflected in the system may not be correct”.

A committee headed by R Balasubramaiam, under the Lokayukta, had submitted a report in 2011 exposing the leakages and mismanagement in the PDS in Karnataka. The reported annual economic loss was  `1,737.6 crore, and this was much before the Rs 4,200 crore subsidy to the ‘Anna Bhagya’ scheme.
The report also had made recommendations to improve the PDS, which are yet to see the light of day.

(The customer was not willing to reveal his name as he feared he will be put to hardship for reporting the incident)