In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, August 26, 2013

4526 - Govt sets 30 Aug deadline for banks to match Aadhaar coverage - Live Mint


Move comes after it became evident that absence of bank accounts linked to Aadhaar numbers could act as a hurdle for direct benefits transfer scheme


First Published: Thu, Aug 22 2013. 04 13 PM IST

A file photo of people registering for Aadhaar card in New Delhi. Photo: Ramesh Pathania/Mint

Updated: Thu, Aug 22 2013. 04 57 PM IST

New Delhi: The government has set a 30 August deadline for banks to match the coverage of Aadhaar in the 20 districts where it has rolled out the direct transfer of cooking gas subsidy, but bankers said the deadline would likely be missed.

The move comes after it became evident that the absence of bank accounts linked to Aadhaar identification numbers issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) could act as a hurdle in the implementation of the so-called direct benefits transfer programme of the government—one of the Congress’ major talking points in coming state and general elections.

Starting 1 September, in the 20 districts where the scheme has been rolled out, customers will have no option but to pay market price for cooking gas and be reimbursed a subsidy through a transfer to their Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. Now, customers who haven’t had their bank accounts linked with Aadhaar numbers have the option of getting subsidized cylinders from dealers.

Bank executives who spoke on the condition of anonymity said the process would likely stabilize well after the deadline expires for consumers, which means that they will have to buy cooking gas cylinders at the market price. The officials blamed part of the problem on infrastructural and procedural issues and the other part on the tendency of customers to not do anything till the deadline for it expired.

A government official who asked not to be identified said the government would take stock of the situation on 30 August.

The bank executives, all district-level bank supervisors, blamed shortage of manpower, incomplete data from oil marketers and issues such as names in Aadhaar-linked database and bank accounts not matching. They also added that many consumers interested to receive the subsidy will approach banks only when cylinders are available only at market price.

“We have been at it, trying to push seeding to Aadhaar penetration levels, but customers will dash to the banks when the subsidized cylinders stop and they feel the pinch,” said one bank executive from a southern district where the LPG benefits transfer began on 1 June. In that district, 74% beneficiaries have their Aadhaar numbers and 49% of accounts have been linked, this person added.
Indeed, all 20 districts chosen for the pilot of the scheme, because of the high Aadhaar penetration in them, have fared badly in terms of linking bank accounts to the unique IDs.

On 26 July, the finance ministry wrote to banks pointing out that the linking of consumer accounts with Aadhaar numbers has been unsatisfactory.

“... to facilitate smooth direct benefit transfer of subsidy to the LPG consumers you may take such necessary steps to ensure that respective bank functionaries obtain Aadhaar number from the customers directly and seed them into the bank accounts without waiting for the Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs) to provide the requisite database of Aadhaar,” the letter said.

A second government official who also did not want to be identified blamed the banks and said they started their linking efforts much after the 1 June start of the scheme in the 20 districts.

“Thirty-five more districts are set to be added from 1 September, but banks have not started doing anything much to get bank accounts seeded,” the official added.

The head of a state-run oil marketer said on 10 August that banks have not been doing their bit. He declined to be named.

To be sure, the linking of bank accounts and Aadhaar numbers has worked far better in the case of cooking gas cylinders than it has for other schemes under the direct benefits transfer programme.

In a 16 August answer to a Parliament question, the finance ministry said only 9.62% of beneficiary accounts for the other schemes under the programme were linked to Aadhaar.

Utpal Bhaskar contributed to this story.