In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, August 15, 2013

4464 - Law ministry says e-KYC valid

Surabhi Agarwal & Vrishti Beniwal  |  New Delhi  August 9, 2013 Last Updated at 00:34 IST


Finance ministry asks bank, insurance & market regulators to issue notifications

In what could do away with the need for physical documents to avail of financial and government services, the law ministry has approved fulfillment of know-your-customer (KYC) norms electronically, through Aadhaar or the unique identification number. The finance ministry has written to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), as well as other regulators such as the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), to issue directives for financial companies to start accepting e-KYC.

In July, Business Standard  had reported there was division on whether e-KYC was allowed under current laws and, therefore, the matter was referred to the law ministry. On condition of anonymity, a government official said the ministry felt since the Information Technology Act considered electronic documents on a par with physical ones, e-KYC was valid. “The finance ministry has sent a letter to RBI and other regulators such as Irda (Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority) and Sebi so that a notification can be issued, after which banks and other financial companies can start using e-KYC,” the official said.

He added the letter was sent “a couple of weeks ago”. The use of e-KYC would not only hasten linkage of bank accounts with Aadhaar for the Direct Benefits Transfer programme, it would also save banks the huge cost incurred in document verification and storage, the official said.

Once e-KYC is implemented, one can open a bank account or get a new insurance policy by providing his/her Aadhaar number and authenticating his/her biometrics. The servers of banks or other financial companies, which would be connected with the UIDAI (Unique Identification Authority of India) server, would check if the details provided by the person are correct. After a customer gives his/her consent, the data drawn from the UIDAI servers for authentication could also be digitally stored by the bank for reference.

The service could also be used to avail of other government services that need authentication.

RBI has already notified Aadhaar number are valid proof of address and identity. So far, UIDAI has issued Aadhaar numbers to 392 million people. By next year, it plans to issue these to 600 million.

While bankers admit e-KYC would help reduce costs, some have raised concerns on the security front and are apprehensive on the use of a new and untested technology. However, those favouring e-KYC argue it is a fool-proof system of establishing identity compared to paper records, which can easily be forged.

“I have not seen the directive yet. But the finance ministry and the RBI must have examined it and it should be a foolproof system,” said executive director of Mumbai-based public sector bank.

Another banker agreed banks might not face any discomfort in implementing e-KYC because Aadhaar number is issued after a proper biometric identification. “There should not be any security risks. It will bring down costs for banks and help in faster implementation of the DBT scheme,” he said. Both of them did not wish to be identified,  as they had not yet received the directive from RBI.