In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, August 3, 2014

5738 - Anna Bhagya: Direct benefit transfer to bank accounts soon - Deccan herald

Bangalore, P M Raghunandan, July 29, 2014, DHNS:

The State government is working towards introducing its own version of Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) based on bank accounts for supplying food grains under its flagship Anna Bhagya scheme (rice at Re 1 per kg), following the Supreme Court order not to use Aadhaar-based DBT for implementing beneficiary-oriented schemes.

The State Food and Civil Supplies department recently held the first round of meeting with representatives of nationalised banks, including State Bank of Mysore, Syndicate Bank and Canara Bank and discussed the plan. The aim is to plug the leakage in implementing the scheme, which is costing a whopping Rs 4,400 crore to the State exchequer every year.

Direct transfer

Commissioner for Food and Civil Supplies Harsh Gupta said the plan is to make all Below Poverty Line (BPL) families eligible to avail the scheme open bank accounts.

The department would directly deposit the subsidy amount in the bank accounts of the BPL card holders on buying food grain by paying full cost of it at the fair price shops.

“All the lead banks have a mandate for ensuring financial inclusion in the State. We have requested the banks to make use of the area-wise BPL card database available with the department to open bank accounts, especially in rural areas. Bank accounts will be linked to BPL cards, enabling the department to transfer the subsidy amount every month.” 

The department is supplying up to 30 kg rice to each of the 1.02 crore BPL card holders every month under the scheme.

The per capita expenditure on food subsidy is estimated at Rs 2,900 per annum. The department has not been able to do much to prevent misuse of the scheme due to the existence of a large number of bogus cards.

Bank-based DBT is expected to eliminate ‘ghost’ card holders. The department had earlier planned to adopt Aadhaar-based DBT for Anna Bhagya, but the apex court order last year spiked its plan.

The Commissioner said the bank account-based DBT plan is likely to be discussed at the State-Level Bankers’ Committee meeting scheduled to be held in Bangalore on August 6. If approved in the meeting, the banks have to obtain the permission of the Reserve Bank of India to join hands with the government to implement the scheme, he added.

Wait for approval

The department is awaiting the Union government’s nod to introduce the DBT for kerosene supply in Mysore, Tumkur and Hubli-Dharwad on a pilot basis. Every litre of kerosene carries a subsidy of Rs 50. The government supplies about 45,000 litres of subsidised kerosene to non-LPG BPL card holders every month.

The Union government bears the entire subsidy burden on kerosene.