In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, August 31, 2014

5806 - Cloud still hangs over Aadhaar's future - Business Standard

Nilekani probably managed to save the project by a persuasive talk with Modi, but the concerns haven't gone away


Surabhi Agarwal  |  New Delhi  August 25, 2014 Last Updated at 00:30 IST

It is widely believed that Nandan Nilekani’s meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi saved the ambitious Aadhaar project from oblivion or a takeover by the home ministry.

Within a couple of days of the meeting, Modi gave directions to expedite enrolments through Aadhaar, along with the direct benefits transfer (DBT) project linked to the unique identity number (UID).

However, the uncertainty surrounding the project hasn't yet been cleared. For, there has been little official communication detailing how the new government sees the project.
It was widely expected that Modi's Independence Day speech would contain several important announcements pertaining to DBT, financial inclusion and health. While Modi did launch a scheme on financial inclusion called the Jan Dhan Yojana, the link with Aadhaar was not spelt out.

UNCERTAIN PATH

  • Nandan Nilekani’s meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi saved the Aadhaar project from takeover by the home ministry
     
  • Modi gave directions to expedite enrolments through Aadhaar along with the direct benefits transfer project
     
  • The uncertainty surrounding the project hasn't been cleared yet. There has been little official communication detailing how the new government sees the project
     
  • The cabinet approved the blueprint for the Digital India project, which envisions a “cradle-to-grave digital identity for every citizen of the country — unique, lifelong, online and authenticable”
     
  • Finance Minister Arun Jaitley is also said to have been tasked with clearing the many legal issues surrounding the project

The Cabinet on Wednesday approved the blueprint for the Digital India project, which envisions a “cradle-to-grave digital identity for every citizen of the country— unique, lifelong, online and authenticable”.

This announcement was also thought to give a fresh lease of life to the Aadhaar project. However, a government official said the link with the UID number is not certain. “It could be any working digital identity”, he said. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), in its pre-election campaign had rapped the Aadhaar project. When the BJP-led government took charge, there were strong doubts over the project’s continuity.

Also, the home ministry bid strongly to bring control of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) under its ambit. It also wanted to merge UIDAI’s database with that of the National Population Register (NPR), a project which has always been at loggerheads with the former.

Work had almost stopped at the UIDAI headquarters when its former chairman and chief architect Nilekani sought a meeting with Modi and finance minister Arun Jaitley. According to people aware of the matter, Nilekani sought the meeting in his personal capacity and not at the behest of the organisation.

He was not accompanied by any officials, contrary to what was reported. During the meeting, in the first week of July, Modi is said to have mostly listened to Nilekani explaining the benefits of the project in the areas of containing subsidies, financial inclusion and tracking financial transactions through online authentication, among others.

Modi did not make many comments and just had a few “good questions” relating to the issue of citizenship and related matters. Soon after at an inter-ministerial meeting, Modi asked officials to fast-track Aadhaar enrolments and the DBT scheme. Jaitley is also said to have been tasked with clearing the many legal issues surrounding the project. Another official, who is more optimistic, claims the government is now, more or less, convinced about the benefits of Aadhaar. “It is not that Modi was not at all informed about the Aadhaar project. It was running in Gujarat when he was the chief minister. But Nilekani’s meeting acted as the catalyst,” said the official.

Despite having given up the post of UIDAI chairman and joining the Congress party, Nilekani did not give up the cause of Aadhaar. He would read the newspaper reports which cast doubts about the project’s future and call officials to enquire. And, then, took it upon himself to do the final convincing.

“It was a meeting between a man who knows the project inside out and the man who has to take the final decision on it.” It showed his commitment towards the project, added the official.

On the issue of what the Congress party thought of Nilekani’s move, a leader said one should not misinterpret it. “He met Modi the prime minister and not Modi the politician.” Another leader added that Aadhaar was Nilekani’s baby and he was a technocrat who “stepped in for a project of national interest”.

Nilekani might have managed quell the initial uncertainty about Aadhaar by meeting the Prime Minister but a lot still needs to be stated by the government in terms of how this project fits into their larger agenda. “If you look at it dispassionately, nothing has changed,” said a not-so-optimistic government official. UIDAI was earlier mandated to enrol 900 million people, the PM has just given directions to complete one billion faster.

There is status quo on the DBT project and there is no clarity on DBT in liquefied petroleum gas. A serious overlap between the UID and NPR continues. “It was the weakness of the earlier government that it did not solve the dispute and even the current one is not interested in resolving it,” said another official. There continues to be several process-related loopholes in the project, which are still not being addressed, despite several warnings.

While one side claims UIDAI’s weak enrolment system could create national security issues in the future, the other side thinks the home ministry wants to control the database since it is so valuable. “Speed is good but accuracy (in collecting data) is paramount, as this data will be used for decades to come,” added the person.

All eyes are now on the rollout plan of the Jan Dhan Yojana and Digital India to see where Aadhaar fits in the Modi government’s scheme of things.