In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, August 3, 2014

5748 - An old programme, a new chapter - Indian Express


Written by Saritha Rai | July 28, 2014 5:00 am

SUMMARY
Nilekani’s efforts to convince the NDA of Aadhaar’s benefits appear to have paid off.

Sources in the UIDAI recount that Modi, as chief minister of Gujarat, was quite taken by the programme. Over 22 million residents in that state have been allocated the 12-digit Aadhaar number.

SUMMARY
Nilekani’s efforts to convince the NDA of Aadhaar’s benefits appear to have paid off.


Nilekani’s efforts to convince the NDA of Aadhaar’s benefits appear to have paid off.

A half-hour meeting that Aadhaar architect Nandan Nilekani had with Prime Minister Narendra Modi earlier this month followed by a conferring couple of days later with Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has reportedly sorted the go-no go situation for the ambitious UIDAI project. The two meetings and a third that Modi held with his key ministers helped resurrect the unique identity programme of the previous UPA government. Subsequent to these meetings, officials have reportedly been instructed to speed up Aadhaar enrolment and work on transferring fuel and pension benefits through the programme. Further signalling its backing, the new government also announced an increase in its budgetary allocation.

Exactly five years ago, Infosys founder Nilekani (now 59) resigned as co-chairman of the firm and set out on a technological mission to build a near fail-safe database of biometric identities for a billion plus Indians. The “transformational project” was intended to help millions with no proof of existence by catapulting them onto a system on the cloud through a unique ID number where their identities could be validated anytime from anywhere within seconds. A lack of verifiable identity has been the bugbear that denies needy Indians access to welfare money even as thousands of crores are siphoned off through fake beneficiary identities and bogus claims.

The programme has already provided the unique 12-digit numbers to 650 million Indians in 18 states, half the country’s population. It has envisaged Aadhaar-bank account linkages and hopes to empower citizens by facilitating the sending and receipt of payments even through their mobile phones. So far, over Rs 4,500 crore has been spent on developing the Aadhaar system. In a pre-election interview, Nilekani had said that no government could afford to scrap the programme. It was too effective a foundation for fundamental reforms of the public delivery system in India, he said.

Despite the size and costs of the programme, the fear was that Aadhaar would get killed in the post-election political transition. Nilekani had resigned his post as UIDAI chairman, rendering it headless, when the Congress announced that he would be its candidate for the prestigious Bangalore South parliamentary seat in April’s Lok Sabha elections. Aadhaar figured prominently in that election campaign as Nilekani’s prime opponent, the BJP’s Ananth Kumar, attacked the programme, called it a national threat and said the NDA government would scrap it when it came to power. Kumar defeated Nilekani by a margin of 2.28 lakh votes and has gone on to become the chemicals and fertilisers minister in the new government.

And so the belief was that the Modi government would abandon the UID and favour the Union home ministry’s National Population Registry (NPR). Several ministers reportedly vociferously argued for the NPR over the UID.

It did not quite happen that way. Sources in the UIDAI recount that Modi, as chief minister of Gujarat, was quite taken by the programme. Over 22 million residents in that state have been identified by their biometrics, enrolled in the database and allocated the 12-digit Aadhaar number.

The crux of the meeting between Nilekani and Modi was three-fold, people in the know told this columnist. The Aadhaar programme would help Modi keep his promise to provide an efficient government by helping usher in extensive welfare reforms. The argument was that the programme could help competently disburse some Rs 3,00,000 crore of welfare money through various government schemes. More importantly, the accuracy of the programme would help bring in the direct benefits transfer scheme to transmit cash to biometrically-identified beneficiaries. If this could help the Modi government plug welfare money leakages to the tune of 15-20 per cent, some Rs 50,000 crore could be shaved off the fiscal deficit.

To remove the legal hurdles arising out of litigation in the Supreme Court (which had ruled that Aadhaar could not be mandatory to provide government services to citizens), it was suggested that the bill be passed in Parliament.

In the five years since its launch, Aadhaar has gone through a host of challenges. There have been on-the-ground problems with enrolment and the delivery of Aadhaar cards. There have been turf wars between ministers in the previous UPA regime over the programme. There have been several legal impediments in the form of court cases. As long as he chaired the UIDAI, Nilekani adroitly managed to overcome most of these travails and push his pet project through. With his pitch to Modi and Jaitley, he may have yet again saved Aadhaar and even breathed fresh life into the programme.

saritha.rai@expressindia.com