AADHAAR RELATED ARTICLES: 5804 - Nandan Nilekani: The rising czar of Bangalore

In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.

On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.

In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.

In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.

In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.

"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi

Ram Krishnaswamy

Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, August 25, 2014

5804 - Nandan Nilekani: The rising czar of Bangalore - Economic Times

Nandan Nilekani: The rising czar of Bangalore

K R Balasubramanyam, ET Bureau Aug 22, 2014, 10.45PM IST

(The purpose of his siding…)

For Bangaloreans, Nandan Nilekani represents much more than Aadhaar or the Congress. He symbolises Bangalore's entrepreneurial spirit in and the world of technology where the country is now competing with the best in the world. The purpose of his siding with the Congress after an eventful career at Infosys was not to park himself to enjoy the spoils of a political post at the centre. Instead, he wanted to use his ideas to provide every Indian with a unique identity, the utility of which is manifold.

But after losing the Lok Sabha polls, the 54-year old tech czar has withdrawn himself into a shell. Even many of those who voted for the BJP don't dispute his usefulness to society and would eagerly welcome his return to the public space.

It is in this context that Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's intention to get the Aadhaar architect back into the realm of public service is both thoughtful and laudable. If the CM pursues his intent with action, it is sure to result in gains for all sides.

In an interview with ET, the chief minister said he plans to create a role for Nilekani to help with Bangalore development. If Siddaramaiah is able to get the billionaire to end his self-imposed seclusion, the Infosys cofounder can well be expected to make a big impact on the way the city plans its infrastructure or delivers public services. Without a doubt, Siddaramaiah is a political leader with a positive rural bias. But Bangalore is where a sixth of Karnataka's population lives. Giving Nilekani a Bangalore-specific role will not just restore the spotlight on Bangalore, it might well make Siddaramaiah-Nilekani a potent political combo. It will be a wise political move for the chief minister, too.

As Bangalore South candidate, Nilekani interacted with thousands of citizens and has first-hand knowledge of the city's problems. More than 15 years ago he founded the Bangalore Agenda Task Force, a public-private partnership to find innovative and speedy solutions to civic problems. So when the polls in his constituency ended, he got down to the serious businesses of developing appropriate technological tools to address the city's problems. It goes without saying Bangalore needs scores of technology-driven solutions, and ideas to evolve itself into a truly world-class city of the future.

At quite another level, Nilekani's loss in Bangalore South could well prove to be a gain for all of Bangalore. Who knows, it could even herald a new beginning in his political career. Didn't Manmohan Singh return as PM after losing the Lok Sabha election from Delhi? Nandan just might bounce back as chief minister of Karnataka one day.