In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, October 13, 2014

5830 - Meet the man who built the awesome online attendance system for India’s government officials - Quartz India



Ram Sewak Sharma is a silver-haired, straight-talking bureaucrat who spent much of the last five years working out of an office near New Delhi’s Connaught Place. Next door to him sat Nandan Nilekani, the former Infosys CEO.

Together, the two men built the world’s largest biometric identification programme, Aadhaar. Nilekani was chairman of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) till he left to join politics, while Sharma served as director general and mission director.

Sharma (right) with Nandan Nilekani in 2012.(Press Information Bureau)

Now, 59-year old Sharma is building an attendance system for India’s central government employees that is inexpensive, publicly available on the internet—and potentially, a simple tool that could revolutionise governance in the country.

Based on the Aadhaar platform, attendance.gov.in is already online and currently undergoing testing with the attendance data of almost 50,000 government employees in New Delhi available online, in real-time.

The website (below) is a near-complete digital dashboard of employee attendance—it logs the entry and exit time, the exact device used and the average time the system took to authenticate an employee’s identity. The data is then organised by departments and ministries, before all the numbers from all of New Delhi are collated and displayed on the homepage.


The entire system is searchable, down to the names of individual central government employees, and all the data is available for download. And with that single step—making the entire platform publicly accessible—the government has introduced a level of accountability and transparency that India’s sprawling bureaucracy is unaccustomed to.

The system cannot track people leaving in between the check in and check out. But it can track chronic late comers. And the public reporting of data creates pressure on supervisors to ensure compliance.

But the origins of this biometric attendance system predate the current government. Instead, it all began when Sharma started work as the chief secretary of Jharkhand after leaving the Aadhaar project last year.

Made in Ranchi
After he took over as chief secretary, making him the top civil servant in the state, Sharma decided to deal with a well-chronicled administrative problem nearly every government office in the country deals with. “There were people spending huge amounts of time in office,” Sharma told Quartz, but there were “some jokers” who would barely come to work at the secretariat in Jharkhand’s capital, Ranchi. “This creates a huge disincentive for people to remain in office.”

The solution, he felt, was to create a “fool-proof” Aadhaar-based biometric attendance system that would be fast, reliable and publicly available. So, two employees of the UIDAI’s centre in the outskirts of Ranchi were brought in to craft the code and build the project from the ground up.

The idea was straightforward. Government employees who already had Aadhaar numbers would use their fingerprints—which were captured during the enrollment process—to register their attendance. Inexpensive biometric scanners would read their fingerprints, send the data to the UIDAI’s servers to authenticate them, confirm the match to the employee and finally, the attendance was displayed on a website.

In an office with wireless internet, the process was designed to take under two seconds, Sharma explained. And if a SIM card was used to connect via a mobile phone network, then the authentication would be completed in between five to six seconds.

The result was attendance.jharkhand.gov.in. Launched in January 2014, Jharkhand’s pioneering online attendance system now tracks almost 34,000 employees, across 69 departments and 24 districts.

A screenshot of Jharkhand’s online biometric attendance system
“Aadhaar is the key,” Sharma said, “In this, we’ve unbundled the entire system, and the infrastructure required is very small.”

Modified in Delhi
In May 2014, Sharma came back to Delhi as the secretary of information technology and communications. With degrees in mathematics from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur and computer science from the University of California (and a certificate in Russian), the 1978 batch IAS officer has over 30 years of experience across departments, including land revenue, transport, finance and human resource development.

Then, in late June, after Narendra Modi took over the government, Sharma and his department made a presentation to the prime minister. The Jharkhand prototype synced well with the new government’s Digital India programme. A decision was made to introduce biometric attendance to all central government offices in New Delhi by October 2014. “We started working around 20 July after receiving the formal communication from the PMO (prime minister’s office),” Sharma said.

Immediately Sharma brought in his crack, two-man UIDAI team from Ranchi that had built his Jharkhand platform, and got down to work. He identified 148 central government departments where the initial rollout would take place and all employees enrolled. Orders were placed for about 3,000 biometric devices and a so-called multi-tenancy website was built—this means the data for each ministry can be accessed if the URL is tweaked. So, while attendance.gov.in shows the attendance data for all the registered departments in New Delhi, mod.attendance.gov.in will open up the data for the ministry of defence (MoD).

In all, it costs around Rs3 crore ($490,000). “It’s still in the trial stage,” said Sharma, “And we are still getting feedback on it.”

One problem that the rollout can face is connectivity. Even in New Delhi, Sharma anticipates that there will be certain offices where connectivity will be an issue. But by using a combination of wireless internet and mobile phone networks, Sharma and his team hope that they’ll be able to ensure that the online authentication process is completed quick enough.

The eventual aim is to share the source code and the platform across state governments, who can then choose to implement it at various levels. In Jharkhand, Sharma explains, it has already been taken to the district level and could be even expanded to government-run hospitals and schools. It could be used, for instance, to track the number of mid-day meal beneficiaries in government schools and then compare that with the actual spending on the programme to ascertain leakages.

“This can become an extremely powerful tool for governance,” said Sharma, “This is only the beginning.”

With such unprecedented scrutiny, others in government, though, are likely to be less excited.