In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

5906 - Column: Aadhaar must for DBT in LPG - Financial Express


Sumita Kale | Published: Oct 27 2014, 01:24 IST

SUMMARY
Going beyond the subsidy payments, Aadhaar will help in de-duplication and better targeting

As the government gets on with clearing the backlog of unfinished work, it has now announced the Modified Direct Benefits Plan for LPG (DBTL). This is a programme that is crucial to rationalising our subsidy bill but has been stuck in a limbo since March this year. The DBTL scheme was rolled out last year for more transparency and preventing diversion of subsidised cylinders for commercial use. There are strong fiscal reasons behind the compulsion of direct transfers; the LPG subsidy rose from R14,257 crore in FY10 to R46,458 crore in FY14. As consumers do not pay the market price, there is currently little awareness about the amount the government pays for each cylinder; the programme therefore sought to make consumers pay the market price for the cylinder and receive the subsidy in an Aadhaar-linked bank account.

By linking Aadhaar to the bank account, the issue of misuse of benefits was also to be addressed. DBTL aimed at covering 291 districts from June 2013 in six phases, targeting 10 crore consumers with more than 3,700 distributors across the three PSU companies. It was an ambitious plan, and got off to a good start in some districts where the Aadhaar enrolment was substantial; however, other places reported severe problems when lack of coordination and communication between the various agencies involved made for confused dealers and consumers. The key issues hinged around the issuance of Aadhaar and poor coordination between the multiple players in the chain.

Even as the government was floundering on fixing the issues, the entire programme, ground to a halt in January with rising complaints. A committee was set up in March under the chairmanship of Prof S G Dhande to review the performance of the programme and in the meantime the Supreme Court stayed the mandatory use of Aadhaar for receiving benefits from the government. The committee submitted its report at the end of May, and now the present government has got its act together, pushing ahead with the DBT for LPG scheme in 54 districts with some important changes; the scheme will roll out across the country over the following months. Given the legal issues and low enrolment of Aadhaar in many districts, the beneficiaries are now expected to submit either an Aadhaar-linked bank account to receive the subsidy or any bank account.

The Modified DBTL is a good move as the programme gets up and running again. With learning from the past rollout, there should be a smoother process this time round. However, there are still some issues to be straightened out. The government has to make that massive outreach to LPG consumers and dealers to inform them of the new process of receiving the benefit. Processes should be streamlined and the consumer grievance redressal cell that is to be a part of this programme now must be efficient and transparent. With no details yet on the proposed revamp of the cell, posting all grievances and their redressal online will improve confidence in the entire system. There is a lot to be done; the problem of diversion of cylinders for commercial use will still need significant monitoring and supervision by the companies and the government.

The question that is probably on top of most people’s minds is, if bank accounts work just as well, does the system of DBTL really need Aadhaar? True, if the aim is just to give the subsidy directly to the consumer, then yes, Aadhaar is not really needed, a bank account is enough. Yet, DBTL has to look beyond just the payment. For instance, de-duplication of accounts. The Dhande Committee has reported that under DBTL last year, 6.18 lakh duplicate connections were identified out of more than 40 million LPG consumers who provided their Aadhaar numbers, and this is where the Aadhaar link will be of real value. More importantly, if there is any intent in the future of moving towards more targeted subsidy, e.g., higher caps in number of subsidised cylinders or higher payouts for BPL population, here again Aadhaar will play a crucial role.

The revamped DBTL programme will take time to settle, and though there may be several glitches, it will prove its worth over time, even to its sceptics.

The author is with Indicus Centre for Financial Inclusion