In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, October 30, 2014

5913 - Memo to Modi: Aadhaar will leave us naked before a Frankenstein state - First Post



by R Jagannathan  Oct 28, 2014 20:53 IST

Nandan Nilekani’s Unique ID scheme, Aadhaar, is making a big comeback under Narendra Modi.

Without strong legal safeguards, it is likely to become a Frankenstein, empowering the state at the expense of the citizen.

The unique Aadhaar number, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India, has been in limbo ever since the Supreme Court made it clear that it cannot be the basis for giving or denying welfare benefits to the poor. In the dying days of the UPA, the Congress party itself chickened out of using Aadhaar for direct benefits transfers (DBT). 

After Modi came to power, it seemed as if the government would bury the scheme and give the home ministry’s National Population Register (NCR) pride of place in issuing citizen ID cards. But Modi, after a presentation from Nilekani himself, appears to have decided that Aadhaar is the way to go.

Modi should hasten slowly in the matter, for Aadhaar is a partly illegal scheme that is collecting citizen’s biometric data without any legislation to protect people from potential misuse. The data collection, outsourced to many private parties, effectively leaves large bits of private data (iris and finger prints, for example) in private hands, even though the idea is to feed the data into a huge centrally-controlled database.

In the past, Aadhaar cards have been issued not only to residents, but trees, chairs and dogs. Even assuming these are minor aberrations, the point is the scope for misuse is very high, since the data primarily passes through private hands – whose antecedents we don’t know anything about and against whom we have no indemnities.




Mr Modi, do not jump into Aadhaar without a strong law to prevent its misuse, and without specifying clearly what the data will be used for and what it will never be used for. Reuters

The attractions of Aadhaar for a government keen to cut subsidies are obvious. A unique ID will ensure that fake and duplicate names are excluded from the roster of welfare beneficiaries. It will also enable inclusive banking to the poor by giving them an identity that otherwise would not have. Modi’s Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana uses Aadhaar to open accounts, even though other forms of ID are also acceptable.

The real problem is Aadhaar puts the cart before the horse, and for that very reason it leaves enormous power in the hands of a faceless bureaucracy which can quietly push the scheme without technically flouting the Supreme Court’s instructions on it. 

6tBanks are quietly pushing Aadhaar, and cooking gas agencies care two hoots about what the Supreme Court has said before asking consumers to produce an Aadhaar number. Marriage registrars and schools in some states are demanding Aadhaar as a prerequisite. A citizen caught in this pincer will, more often than not, acquiesce. Where the rubber hits the road, the Supreme Court can do nothing to protect us as it cannot fight the bureaucracy in every state.

As I have written repeatedly, Aadhaar is of questionable legality, and sooner or later a court interested in privacy and individual freedom cannot but strike it down – or at least modify some aspects of it. If Modi is really keen on Aadhaar, he must first legislate stringent laws that will penalise anyone who can ever misuse the data – including, and especially, the government. 

Aadhaar is currently stealing every Indian resident’s most private data (his identity, his biometrics, his fingerprints) and pretending it is doing him a favour.

Any society that values citizen’s rights should be wary of keeping an entire population’s biometric and personal details in huge databases controlled by a faceless bureaucracy. We need only refer to the widespread accessing of mobile call data records by the powerful to know how much misuse is possible.

Aadhaar is being sold as a way to empower the poor who don’t have an identity but need government subsidies to survive. But it is being covertly pushed to the entire population using the coercive power of the bureaucrat’s pen. If bank accounts, provident funds, mutual funds, gas connections, and big financial transactions of citizens are going to need an Aadhaar number, this means the government has forced a unique ID on us indirectly without even legally being entitled to do so.

Also, since private parties have collected my biometrics, who will be held responsible if this data is found in the wrong hands?

And let’s not forget how Aadhaar empowers the state at the expense of the citizen. Once your income-tax numbers, bank accounts, credit card transactions, and asset purchases are linked through a common Aadhaar number, anyone in any part of a coercive tax system can blackmail you if your assets and financial details are leaked. Not only that, when the next big terror attack happens, suddenly the government will have a huge justification to use the data to track potential terrorists. After that, we will be sliding down a slippery slope to lower levels of privacy protection for all citizens.

The Indian will be left naked against a Frankenstein state.

So, Mr Modi, do not jump into Aadhaar without a strong law to prevent its misuse, and without specifying clearly what the data will be used for and what it will never be used for.