In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

5847 - Confused Babudom Evades Modi's Attendance Fiat - New Indian Express

By Devirupa Mitra
Published: 12th Oct 2014 06:06:02 AM

R S Sharma sent a letter to 150 odd officers

NEW DELHI: Central government employees in the capital have only a fortnight left to get on board Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s pet big brother project—biometric attendance system for babus. Never mind the fact that it is plagued by myriad issues like lack of registration and privacy for thousands of employees and several organisations still out of its loop, including the Prime Minister’s Office.

On Thursday, secretary (information technology) R S Sharma sent a letter to all the 150-odd secretaries in Delhi after a review of the attendance system was done in the Prime Minister’s office a day earlier. “It was noted that all the employees of the ministries/departments have so far not registered and the number of employees marking their attendance is also only about 50 per cent,” Sharma said.

The letter then conveyed the decision of the “meeting in PMO” that all employees should register and start marking their attendance “immediately”. “The expectation is 100 per cent enrolment of employees and all employees present should mark attendance. This should be ensured as early as possible, in any case before October 25, 2014,” said Sharma’s signed missive.

 The letter annexed the statistics of attendance compiled for the day (October 8), which demonstrated the uphill task—only 48 per cent of employees had marked attendance, that is, 24,107 out of 49,505 registered employees among 146 ministries and departments.  The situation becomes starker when comparing the number of people who mark their attendance with the total estimated employees—just 36 per cent.

However, the listed ministries did not include the Prime Minister’s office itself—nor was it also included in the website for the project. The system had been softly launched over a month ago, when ministries and departments were asked to install the new fingerprint devices. These are all linked to Unique Identification Authority of India’s servers with the Aadhar biometric information used to verify the registrants. Incidentally, Sharma had been UIDAI director general for five years.

Finally, all the information is filtered through the website, attendance.gov.in, which displays real-time information on the attendance status in government offices. However,  the main web portal which showcases the attendance seems to have been done in a hurry. 

A 28-year-old IT engineer, Shirsendu Karmakar went behind the scenes, so to say, to check the coding of attendance.gov.in after it went on hanging his computer. 

“I had visited the site after I read a lot of praise about it online. But, what I saw in the coding was rather shocking. It showed that it was done in a hurry and by inexperience people,” said Karmakar, who blogged about the drawbacks in the code.

Interestingly, one of the most controversial aspects of the attendance system, which created a lot of heartburn among bureaucrats, has been veiled from the public. Till Thursday, any visitor could find out the entry and exit timing of an official by name, the last four numbers of their mobile and their performance over a certain range of date. But, a visit on Friday showed that the earlier transparency was gone – and now the only status accessible was whether a specific government official was “active” or “inactive”.

“There was really no need to know for the general public to know by individual officer the incoming and outgoing time. This should be basically only revealed to the head of department,” said a senior government official. On Friday, the external affairs ministry was the best-performing among all the central government offices in Delhi—largest number of 1,483 employees marked their attendance. They were followed by the national informatics centre and the department of agriculture and cooperation.

At the same time, there were 12 departments and ministries which showed ‘zero’ attendance. The most notable was the ministry of railways, as well as several departments of the defence ministry, including Defence Research and Development Organisation. The National Investigative Agency, under MHA, also showed no attendance. According to sources, there were objections from MHA on security grounds, as no WiFi system is allowed inside North Block. Most of the ministries have also said that the slow process of registration was due to the fact that officers were still in the process of getting an Aadhar card.

It remains to be seen if marking attendance actually translates into good governance.