In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, April 9, 2015

7740 - As DBT's scope expands, bank accounts linkage to get precedence over Aadhaar

As per mandate, no beneficiary would get any payment in cash or by cheque after April 30


Surabhi Agarwal  |  New Delhi  April 7, 2015 Last Updated at 18:46 IST

As the government expands the scope of the direct benefits transfer scheme to include all welfare payments, it is planning to first link the bank account details of the beneficiaries. The sourcing and the seeding of the databases with Aadhaar will be done at a later stage.

This method is expected to expedite the migration of all the subsidy schemes on the DBT platform since the government has notified that all beneficiaries should necessarily be transferred their welfare payments into their bank accounts. As per the mandate, no beneficiary would get any payment in cash or by cheque after April 30.

The union government has recently decided to expand the scope of DBT massively to include each and every welfare payment made by the Centre government or a Public Sector Unit (PSU). In the first phase, DBT included only 27 schemes which majorly consisted of scholarships and LPG subsidy.

While payments under various pension schemes as well as under the job guarantee scheme MGNREGA will form a major chunk of the transactional volumes of the expanded project, the new mandate will also mean that payments under the smallest of state government and central government welfare schemes will have to be done necessarily through the DBT platform.
According to government officials familiar with the discussions, the focus currently is on digitizing the databases, which are currently maintained on paper registers. "Almost 10-15% of the fakes and duplicates will be removed from the system the moment the databases are fed into the computer," said a government official.

Once the digitisation is complete, the bank accounts will be linked so that money can be transferred directly into the accounts at the earliest and seeding with Aadhaar will be done later on, added the official.

Though this strategy may help in fast tracking the project, another set of experts argue that defocusing from Aadhaar will pose new concerns. It could introduce new kinds of fakes and duplicates in the system as without Aadhaar it will be difficult to ascertain uniqueness of an individual. "Someone with duplicate entries in the system could feed multiple bank accounts," said another government official.

Another roadblock ahead of complete seeding of Aadhaar with the databases is the Supreme Court order which has advised the government against making Aadhaar mandatory for availing of government services. In this backdrop, a third government official said that the authorities are not insisting on Aadhaar and are linking it only at places where residents are voluntarily sharing their Aadhaar numbers.

Another concern of authorities is that they claim getting the Unique Identity number for each beneficiary within a month's time would be difficult since the database created by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) can only authenticate the identity of a person by saying yes or no but can't share any other details.

"In states where the National Population Register has been tasked with collecting the biometrics, they have created a district/village wise register of residents along with their Aadhaar numbers. In such areas it is very easy to link both the bank account as well as the Aadhaar," said the first official quoted above.

So far UIDAI has issued Aadhaar to 807 million people in the country.