In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, June 4, 2016

10080 - Efforts to link bank accounts with Aadhaar gather steam - Live Mint

Last Modified: Wed, Jun 01 2016. 04 31 AM IST


The government’s efforts are primarily geared towards fixing leaks in the direct benefit transfer schemes and ensure people got the funds in a secure manner

Viswanath Nair

Mumbai: Efforts to link bank accounts to Aadhaar, which had slowed after an adverse Supreme Court order and a central bank notification, have picked up again, with banks starting email and text message campaigns targeting their urban customers, four bankers in the know said.

“While there is no explicit direction from the government on seeding Aadhaar numbers to bank accounts, they do keep inquiring every time there is a Jan Dhan meeting about the progress on it,” said the managing director and chief executive officer of a public sector bank, the first of the four bankers mentioned above, on condition of anonymity, as the meeting with government officials is confidential. The effort was initially targeted at those holding Jan Dhan accounts and later expanded to all urban customers.

As of 25 May, 219 million bank accounts were opened under the Jan Dhan Yojana, of which over 100 million were linked to Aadhaar. In comparison, there were 158 million accounts a year ago, of which 61 million accounts were Aadhaar-linked.

“There are a number of urban customers who still depend on government subsidies, such as those received for LPG (liquified petroleum gas). Aadhaar linkage is very easy for them as the government can send a payment directly to their bank accounts. 

A lot of our mobile campaigns have been focussed on them. For other customers, we can reduce the amount of paperwork required to maintain a bank account, by using a unique identification number,” said the retail chief at a large private sector bank, also speaking on condition of anonymity, as he isn’t allowed to speak to the press.

This banker added that the attempt is to encourage customers to use Aadhaar as a primary know-your-customer document, without making it mandatory.

While banks have been pushing for Aadhaar seeding with bank accounts for two years, the pace slackened after Supreme Court orders in August and October 2015. The order in October said that Aadhaar cannot be made mandatory for any government benefits and can be voluntarily used to gain benefits of the MGNREGA, government pension scheme, Jan Dhan Yojana and the employment provident fund.

The apex court’s main reservation against making Aadhaar mandatory was the privacy concerns around it. Following this, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in January notified that the seeding of bank accounts with Aadhaar is purely voluntary and can’t be insisted upon by banks.

The notification marked a reversal of the regulator’s previous stance of getting banks to sign up a large number of customers on the Aadhaar network. In July 2013, RBI asked banks to take steps to complete account opening and seeding Aadhaar numbers in all districts eligible for direct benefit transfers. With a view to facilitating DBT for delivery of social welfare benefits through direct credit to the bank accounts of beneficiaries, RBI had advised lenders to open accounts in camps with support from local authorities.

The attempt to use Aadhaar to curb subsidy leakages, which started during the previous government, has been continued by the current administration. In his budget speech in February, finance minister Arun Jaitley said the government would provide statutory backing to Aadhaar

In March 2016, the Lok Sabha passed the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Bill, 2016, which seeks to make the use of Aadhaar mandatory to avail subsidies.

The government’s efforts were primarily geared towards fixing leaks in the DBT schemes and ensure that the beneficiaries got the funds in a secure manner.

“The bottomline is to move away from physical cash and towards a digital money economy... With Aadhaar, the banks can achieve a broader objective of digitizing data which can be used to gain analytical information. This would improve the life of the customers for the better. Moreover, it will also help banks reduce their cost of delivery by making services more customised,” said Naresh Makhijani, partner and head (financial services) at consultancy KPMG.