In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, February 7, 2018

12861 - Union budget shows "no concern" for hunger, malnutrition, rural distress, reduces maternal benefit allocation - Counterview



Our Representative


Calling the 2018-19 Union budget "highly disappointing", the top advocacy group, Right to Food Campaign (RFC), in a comprehensive analysis, has said, it has "miserably failed to respond to the present situation of rural distress and mass unemployment", adding, "Despite a spate of starvation deaths in different parts of the country, the budget makes no mention of hunger or malnutrition."

Thus, RFC says, "There was some hope that the budget would be used as an opportunity to expand the Public Distribution System (PDS) to include nutritious food items such as pulses and edible oils. However, there was no such announcement." 
It aadds, even though the food subsidy has increased from Rs 1.45 lakh crore in 2017-18 to almost Rs 1.69 lakh crore in 2018-19, an increase of 17%, it "masks reductions in several sub-categories of expenditure". For instance, "the subsidy for decentralised procurement is reduced from Rs 38,000 crore to Rs 31,000 crore", which would "adversely impact poor states such as Chhattisgarh and Odisha that rely on this subsidy." 
Similarly, RFC says, "The assistance to state agencies for intra-state movement of foodgrains and fair price shop dealers is slashed from Rs 4,500 crore to Rs 4,000 crore", and its impact would compounded by the "10% increase in diesel prices over the past year."

Pointing out that the Midday Meals budget, increased from Rs 10,000 crore to Rs 10,500 crore, RFC says, it is "not an increase at all when adjusted for inflation", adding, "There is no reflection of any attempts to improve the quality of the meals by including nutrient rich items like eggs, fruits and milk."
While the budget for the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) is up from Rs 15,245 crore to Rs 16,334 crore, RFC says, it includes "an allocation of over Rs 300 crores as ‘management costs for aadhaar enrolment',", underlining, "There are a number of ethical concerns with the coerced enrolment of children by aadhaar, that too with the budget meant for children’s health and nutrition." 

At the same time, it notes, "Small children will also suffer from the 36% reduction in the budget for the National Crèche Scheme -- from Rs 200 crore in 2017-18 to Rs 128.4 crore in 2018-19."

Regarding the budgetary allocation for the National Nutrition Mission (Rs 3,000 crore), RFC says, the budget "does not indicate how it will be utilised", adding, "Before expending the funds of this mission, the details have to be made public to ensure transparency, and it should be accompanied by public consultations and deliberations."

Sharply criticizing the government for allocating a mere Rs 2,400 crore in place of of Rs 2,594 crore for the maternity entitlement scheme, Pradhan Mantri Matru Vandana Yojana, RFC says, "The allocation has gone down in a context where recent data from the Ministry of Women and Child Department shows that there is a huge backlog of applications from last year with only 2% of the eligible women covered until January 2018." 


Further, it says, the reduction comes at a time when the government has slashed the benefit from Rs 6000 to Rs 5,000, restricting it to the first birth, adding, "A maternity entitlement scheme as per the National Food Security Act entitlements requires a budget of about Rs 13,000 per pregnant woman. The government should allocate at least 60% of this amount, i.e. Rs 7,800."