Why this Blog ? News articles in the Wide World of Web, quite often disappear with time, when they are relocated as archives with a different url. Archives in this blog serve as a library for those who are interested in doing Research on Aadhaar Related Topics. Articles are published with details of original publication date and the url.
Aadhaar
The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018
When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi
In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi
“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi
“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.
Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.
Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha
“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh
But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP
“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.
August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"
“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden
In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.
Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.
Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.
UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy
1) Denial
2) Issue fiats and point finger
3) Shoot messenger
4) Bury head in sand.
God Save India
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
325 - Identity - Financial Express article
The Financial Express
Posted: Tuesday, Jul 13, 2010 at 2048 hrs IST
When the Indian government announced a new ID card scheme in January 2009, which would bring some coherence to the more than dozen ID proofs already floating around, it created interest. In June 2009, when Nandan Nilekani was recruited to head the scheme and accorded ministerial status, too, this was the first time a globally recognised Indian technologist had been promoted to the top government ranks. This attracted extraordinary interest. Nilekani himself pointed to the challenges and promises of the project. “No country in the world has done what we are embarking to do, this is the big enchilada,” he said. At the same time, he clarified to The Indian Express: “I’m like a mega project manager working with thousands of government agencies, not to mention dealing with the politics of it.” His concerns have proved well-judged. While supporters have been enthusiastic about all the far-reaching effects of a UID, from better targeted delivery of public services to better tax collection, detractors in various guises have been equally vociferous. Whether it is those who have raised the privacy bogey or those that are visibly vested in protecting their turfs (by way of alternative, existing ID cards, for example), Nilekani has been convincingly battling these detractors by arguing that social, economic and efficiency benefits of the UID will be worth its costs. Now comes the news that the government has decided to slash the budget of the UID project by more than half, from Rs 7,000 crore to Rs 3,000 crore for the first phase. But even such a curtailment leaves a lot of room for Nilekani’s team to prove the worth of the project.
Sure, only 10 crore UIDs instead of 60 crore will be assigned as a result of this budget curtailment. But if this assignment goes through smoothly, if it even begins to deliver the promised low-cost high-volume service and finance penetration, if these deliveries attain a critical mass, then more funds will necessarily follow. These will follow on popular demand rather than government fiat. And let’s underline that some of the UPA’s dearest schemes of today are intimately tied up with the UID project. The fate of the Food Security Bill behind which the substantial weight of the Sonia-Gandhi-led National Advisory Council has been put, for example, is closely connected to the rollout of the UID project—as is the ‘inclusive growth’ agenda in general.