In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, July 18, 2010

286 - Infosys to snoop on staffers' rants on social media networks

Infosys to snoop on staffers' rants on social media networks


Praveena Sharma / DNAWednesday, July 14, 2010 1:42 IST


Bangalore: If you are an Infoscion — an employee of Infosys Technologies —better be on your guard. That casual banter about a colleague or a project on Facebook or Orkut might land you in trouble. Come August, whatever you post on the social media network will be under the company’s watch.

The technology biggie is planning to introduce a social media policy, a first in India, to make employees more responsible in their expressions. In an extreme scenario, an Infoscion could lose his job if his post on the social media network breaches the company’s code of conduct.

“We are addressing our concerns on privacy of client data that could be leaked out in the social media circles (by employees).

We also want our employees to understand that they are accountable and responsible for what they express (about the company) in that space,” Nandita Gurjar, senior vice-president and group head, human resources, Infosys, said on Tuesday.
Gurjar, however, declined to call it censorship. “It’s just discipline,” she said.

The company has a code of conduct in place for its internal social media network; it now wants to use it for external communication by employees. Most major global companies like Microsoft, Yahoo and Intel already have a similar regulation in place.

It spells out clearly what employees can express in that space and what they can’t.

For instance, computer chipmaker Intel’s rule book on social media conduct asks its employees to “respect proprietary information and content, and confidentiality”. This is just one of the many conduct codes listed out by the US company.
Gurjar said a large part of Infosys’ code of conduct would revolve around confidentiality of client information and employee opinions that could be offensive to others.

“You can disagree but not be disagreeable. You have the right to an opinion and can debate with the CEO very openly and say his idea is lousy but you can’t call him stupid. You can’t get personal in your remarks (about your colleague) on the social media,” said Gurjar.

Gurjar has started working towards formalising the policy and is expected to make a presentation of it to a team of the IT industry lobby body — National Association of Software and Services Companies (Nasscom) - in Chennai on July 22 and July 23.

“They (Nasscom) are asking us how we are doing it (coming out with policy). They will roll it out everywhere,” she said. Gurjar is expecting other companies to emulate Infosys’ move. “More companies will follow us immediately. We will do it in August and by December everybody would have done it because they are all asking about it,” she said.

Ganesh Natarajan, former chairman of Nasscom, is not as optimistic about regulating employees. “It is (corporate social media policy) a very bad idea. On the contrary, I believe, free flow
of expression should be encouraged through the media.

Obviously, something vulgar or rude should be checked but not through regulating the social media activities of employees,” said Natarajan.

According to him, a policy may not help to curb the strong blogging community.