Why this Blog ? News articles in the Wide World of Web, quite often disappear with time, when they are relocated as archives with a different url. Archives in this blog serve as a library for those who are interested in doing Research on Aadhaar Related Topics. Articles are published with details of original publication date and the url.
Aadhaar
The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018
When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi
In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi
“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi
“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.
Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.
Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha
“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh
But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP
“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.
August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"
“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden
In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.
Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.
Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.
UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy
1) Denial
2) Issue fiats and point finger
3) Shoot messenger
4) Bury head in sand.
God Save India
Friday, July 9, 2010
257 - Indonesia to Join the Smart Card Set
Written by Our Correspondent
FRIDAY, 04 SEPTEMBER 2009
Everything you ever wanted to know about everybody
Indonesia appears about to become the latest country in Asia to adopt computer chip-laden national identity cards making voluminous amounts of personal identification available to government officials.
Indonesia’s proposed card, which is to begin field trials before the end of the year, will feature 37 items of personal information including birth certificate, marital status, blood type, parents’ name and employment, physical and/or mental disabilities and fingerprints of all fingers plus a photo. Officials envision that it will be used to identify voters, putting to rest problems of multiple voting that have dogged Indonesian elections.
Field trials can serve as a warning of another sort for prospective vendors. There is little Indonesian officials like better than a competition between companies to line up with their hands out, palms up.
Indonesia’s move comes at a time when civil rights organizations across the world are growing uneasy about the mass of personal information that becomes available to governments, particularly as computers have grown more sophisticated. The move by governments to increase such information has grown significantly since Sept. 11, 2001, when terrorists crashed airplanes into the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington, DC.
That is unsettling for the London-based Privacy International, which was formed in 1990 to combat invasions of privacy. On its website, the organization charges that a survey of the use of ID cards around the globe “found claims of police abuse by way of the cards in virtually all countries. Most involved people being arbitrarily detained after failure to produce their card. Others involved beatings of juveniles or minorities. There were even instances of wholesale discrimination on the basis of data set out on the cards.”
Cards, the organization claims, are “often alleged to be the vehicle for discriminatory practices. Police who are given powers to demand ID invariably have consequent powers to detain people who do not have the card, or who cannot prove their identity. Even in such advanced countries as Germany, the power to hold such people for up to 24 hours is enshrined in law. The question of who is targeted for ID checks is left largely to the discretion of police.”
The growing sophistication of what can be loaded onto a card is staggering. Malaysia was the first country to pioneer a computerized card that carries 64 kilobytes of information that isn’t just an ID card. It is a driver’s license, passport and health storage repository. It can function as a cash card with a maximum limit of US$500, a toll-road and public transport payment system and is integrated into automatic teller machines.
Other countries in Asia have or are adopting chip identification cards of varying sophistication except for the Philippines, where the government was forced by civil rights groups to abandon plans for a single national identification system, claiming it was a violation of privacy. In addition to government identification purposes, Singapore’s card can also be used for day-to-day transactions, obtaining discounts at some stores and for logging on to certain websites on the Internet. Schools use them for student identification and for exams. In Hong Kong, a smart ID card contains 13 pieces of information which authorities say is protected by privacy regulations. It can also be used as a library card and for other functions.
Although more than 100 countries have a national identity card system, according to Privacy International, many developed countries don’t have them. They include the United States, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, Ireland, the Nordic countries and Sweden.
That doesn’t stop Privacy International from labeling the United States an “endemic surveillance society” along with Russia, China and North Korea, among other countries. Although US citizens have always rebelled against a national identification card, the government has voluminous computerized information from myriad sources. According to testimony before several Congressional committees earlier this year, the National Security Agency’s domestic surveillance program involved extensive intercepts of private communications, both telephonic and on e-mail.
Greece, according to the organization, is the only country on the planet that falls into the “green zone” of countries that have adequate safeguards against abuse, India, currently in Privacy International’s pink zone, appears about to join the black countries. In June, it launched the world’s largest program to register its more than one billion citizens. Indonesian officials aren’t particularly concerned about the privacy issue.
“You can no longer lie about your marital status,” Saut Situmorang, spokesman for the Indonesia Home Affairs Ministry, told reporters in Jakarta. “If you try to cheat a girl by saying that you’re single when you’re not, one swipe of your card will reveal all your information. Your future parents-in-law will no longer be nice to you.”
The government plans to test the new ID card in pilot projects by the end of the year in four cities — Denpasar, Makassar, Padang and Yogyakarta, officials said. The Jakarta city administration will run its own pilot program.
Saut said the purpose of the pilot projects were to find the best model to replicate across the country. “If we could launch the pilots by the end of this year, next year ... we’ll apply it nationwide,” he told reporters. “We’re obliged to find the best system compatible to be applied in all areas.”
The central government is calculating the budget needed for the new card and will soon begin procurement of hardware and software for the project and train staff to eventually mass register the population, Saut said.
The Jakarta city government is voluntarily joining the national project, said
“We’re intensively coordinating with the central government to grasp the concept of the E-KTP,” he said on Sunday.
“Though it’s a local government initiative, we want to make sure that we will implement the same system that is planned to be applied nationally.”
Nurrahman said Jakarta wanted to begin its pilot project by December or early next year using the same system as the central government. “We will probably start this year with one subdistrict,” he said. “Next year, we hope to have already applied it in all areas of Jakarta.
“Many of our citizens have more than one KTP [identity card]. When they move to other cities, they make new cards until they have dozens,” said Nurrahman, head of population administration development at the Jakarta Population and Civic Registration Agency. “Under the new system, you no longer need to apply for new card when you move to other city, only re-enter the data.”
Editor's note: Asia Sentinel had no idea, contrary to the two letters below, of any involvement of either the Lippo Group or the Riady family in the contest to develop an Indonesian smart identity card. Our interest was in the privacy issues of electronic storage of personal information, as the story clearly points out. Any imputation that Asia Sentinel was backing any interest is erroneous and threatens our integrity as a journalistic enterprise.