In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, July 30, 2010

343 - Nandan-ji's New ID by Bachi Karkaria-29 July 2009


29 July 2009, 10:13 PM IST

In Delhi last week, I found myself at a political party. Not the kind where leaders gather at its grimy office, but the kind where they banter in the host's snazzy 'den'. That night, the principal schmoozer and schmoozee was Nandan Nilekani. At first I gaped in disbelief. Isn't Infosys as far removed from Page Three as Sushma Swaraj is from Queenie Dhody? Then I remembered that Nandan N is not quite Narayana M.

Anyone who toured his book with such panache is clearly to the manner acculturated. The outbreak of celebrity authors now rivals that of H1N1 cases, and if Tom Friedman has become the J Lo of the thinking classes, then Nandan too must be as socially sultry as Nandita. Yes Ms Das was also at that Delhi party and gave due face-time to the feted Mr Nilekani, though he was clearly outclassed by Shashi Tharoor, that global pro of the political, literary and Saint Emilion circuits.

'Nandan Rising' has been endorsed by all the Grand Anointers, from Bill Gates to Fareed Zakaria; only Oprah is missing. But Nilekani starred at that Delhi party not because of his 'Imagining India', but because of his ID-ing of  India. He's the new kid on the North & South Blocks, equal to a fully-furnished mantri-ji.

In fact, he's more. The Unique Identification Authority of India is a smartphone compared to the clunky conventional ministries. It's the UPA 0.2's new status symbol. Forget the official eyewash about duplicates, fraud and illegal Bangladeshis. The real agenda is brand positioning. Ration cards are so Garibi Hatao, biometric cards are so Global Banao.

Nilekani may be to Sonia what Pitroda was to Rajiv, but he better look sharp. He is the flavour of the week but he can speedily end up as the dish of the day. At first faltering, New Delhi's piranhas will eat him alive. He has plunged into perilous waters; the assigned task is not easy. No, i'm not worried about his ability to tag India's eye-goggling numbers with a UID. With his skills he can sort and label the aam janata like a basket of totapuris. It's some of the complex khaas lot who will make our Nandan lose his glossy job and curls.

Let me explain. There has been a virtual epidemic of Very Important Identities suddenly undergoing strange mutations. Two days ago, Anil Ambani declared that Murli Deora had changed from being India's petro min and turned into Mukesh's pet min. Last week, even the PM was seen to be infected. Learning to speak for himself turned out to be as contentious as being a ventriloquist's dummy, and now he has to start using the voice of the Congress party. So what UID will Mr Nandan-ji assign to both these gentlemen, assuming that VVIPs are not exempt from biometric frisking?

Or take Mayawati. Since her duplicates are springing up like well-wisher ads, our man might mistakenly assign her UID to a statue. Didi is so one-track that Nilekani is in no danger of dealing with colliding UIDs in her case. But her political rivals in West Bengal have displayed such conflicting identities in recent times that it will definitely stump even the man from the home state of the duplicitous Deve Gowda.

Everywhere, everyone could easily be someone other than what s/he appears to be. The innocuous guy with the bomb in his tiffin-box, the corporate head honcho who smiles as he kills, the socialite mistress of the Judas airkiss. How then will the talented Mr Nilekani arrive at the authentic bio-signature of these people with such multi-tasking identities?

There is only one solution. Put the whole lot through 'Sach ka Samna'.