In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

249 - PDS in a shambles - Source Hindu Business line


The time has come to examine whether there could be an alternative to the existing PDS. Experts suggest giving cash directly to the eligible poor through a coupon system as an option.
The poor seldom get PDS foodgrains in proper quantity and quality.

S. D. Naik

The Supreme Court-appointed Central Vigilance Committee's report on the sale of foodgrains through the public distribution system (PDS) throughout the country will not come as a surprise to anyone.

The Committee's finding that shop-owners, transporters, and officers have been colluding to deprive the poor and that the whole system is in a shambles, only reinforces what earlier studies had pointed out more than a decade ago.

The Committee headed by the retired Supreme Court judge, Justice D. P. Wadhwa, found that there was large-scale diversion and black marketing of PDS foodgrains. “Subsidised PDS foodgrains does not reach the poor who desperately need the same. These poor people never get PDS foodgrains in proper quantity and quality. The fair price owner is aware of bogus/fake ration cards and uses these for black marketing of PDS foodgrains,” the Committee's report said.

Commenting on the State-wise situation, the Committee said the PDS has collapsed in Rajasthan; in Jharkhand, the system is a glaring example of what the system ought not to be; in Bihar, the beneficiaries get ration of a month after a wait of three-four months; in Gujarat, shop-owners admitted bribing the officials; in Orissa, grain storage agents are susceptible to political influence; in Karnataka, there is collusion between officials, investigating agencies, dealers, wholesalers and other vested interests.

A study in 2007 had revealed that over a three-year period alone Rs 31,586 crore worth of wheat and rice meant for the poor were siphoned off and sold in the open market illegally.

GROWING CORRUPTION

The number of “ghost” ration cards at that time, were found to be at a staggering 2.3 crore, while as many as l.21 crore deserving poor had been left out of the food security umbrella.

The study had also pointed out that every year the poor were cheated out of 53.3 per cent of wheat and 39 per cent of rice allocated for PDS. The worst offenders were Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Maharashtra. The North-East was worse off: Of the eight North-East States, not a single grain supplied to Sikkim, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland and Assam reached the targeted population. In fact, it was found that the grains allotted did not even reach the States concerned and were siphoned off from Delhi itself.

Similarly, in the case of PDS kerosene too. About 35 per cent of it finds its way to the open market where it is sold at about Rs 25 a litre against the controlled price of Rs 11. It is also used to adulterate diesel and petrol.

Every year lakhs of tonnes of foodgrains are allowed to rot and go waste because of the severe erosion of PDS-related infrastructure, improper warehousing facilities, decline in the number of fair price shops, understaffed monitoring mechanism, and laxity in anti-hoarding laws.

In fact, coinciding with the release of the report, there have been reports about foodgrains worth crores of rupees rotting on roads in Punjab for want of warehousing facilities. The Punjab Government has reportedly requested the Centre to lift the stock and distribute the same to the poor free of cost, if necessary.

According to the State Government sources, the stocks are already pledged to the Centre, but the Centre has not lifted the same. Consequently, some 70 lakh tonnes of stocks have been rotting. Still greater worry is, fresh harvest will be arriving within the next few weeks and the State Government is finding itself in a difficult situation.

The Agriculture Minister, Mr Sharad Pawar, has promised hiring of more godowns to store the excess stocks. One wonders why the Government is not off-loading more stocks in the open market, instead of allowing the excess stocks to rot in warehouses and on the roads at a time when the high food inflation continues to remain a major worry.

In fact, this is a recurring problem. In July 2008, for instance, it was reported that over 10 lakh tonnes of foodgrains, that could have fed one crore hungry people for one year, were damaged in FCI godowns. The damages were incurred, despite the FCI spending Rs 242 crore to prevent such losses.

Meanwhile, the food subsidies paid by the Centre have more than doubled over the last four years to Rs 56,000 crore in 2009-10, but the Centre and the State governments have failed to reduce wastages and improve delivery mechanisms by plugging the enormous leakages.

WAY FORWARD

Clearly, the time has come to examine whether there could be an alternative to the existing PDS.

In fact, this assumes greater urgency since the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) headed by the Finance Minister, Mr Pranab Mukherjee, has now cleared the National Food Security Bill, guaranteeing 25 kg of wheat and rice to the poor every month at Rs 3 a kg.

The Bill is expected to be tabled in Parliament in the monsoon session to fulfil the poll pledge of the UPA Government. Once it becomes law, the Government's food subsidy bill is expected to go up further.

To eliminate, or at least minimise, the prevailing corruption and wastages, a better alternative suggested by many experts is giving cash directly to the eligible poor through a coupon system. In fact, the latest Economic Survey has also come out with a similar suggestion which appears to be quite pragmatic. It says:

To make PDS more effective, and leak-proof, the subsidy should be handed over directly to the households who should be given the freedom to choose which store it buys the food from.

The households should be given the coupons which can be used at PDS stores in lieu of money when buying wheat or rice and the stores should be free to charge the prevailing market rate.

Such a system will be more impervious to corruption, says the Economic Survey. However, for the full success of this “coupon system” what is needed is an effective method of identifying the poor.

This is where the proposed Unique Identification (UID) System would come into play. Hopefully, the UID System would be in place before the passing of the National Food Security Act.