In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

1313 - IBM, HP opt out of 2,000-crore UIDAI bid-Source-Economic Times

17 MAY, 2011, 04.15 AM IST, 

HARSIMRAN JULKA & SHRUTI SABHARWAL,ET BUREAU 


NEW DELHI: Two of the world's largest technology companies - IBM and HP - on Monday opted out from bidding for the 2,000-crore outsourcing contract to manage the world's biggest citizen identity database, people familiar with the development said.

The Unique Identity Development Authority of India, or UIDAI, headed by Infosys founder Nandan Nilekani , had asked vendors to submit their proposals for the contract by Monday evening. After IBM and HP dropped out from the race, the remaining five - Accenture , Wipro, TCS , HCL Infosystems and Mahindra Satyam - will go to the next stage and begin their negotiations with the UID officials.

"They (IBM and HP) are not interested," confirmed an official familiar with the bidding.

In one of the biggest outsourcing contracts to be awarded this year by any Indian government department, the selected vendor will manage all IT and the national repository which will contain data of all Indian citizens.

Executives at vendors who decided not to bid said it was a decision by Global HQs not to participate in bidding.

"As far as I know, we have not submitted any bids, the conditions did not match our processes," said another person who requested anonymity because he is not authorised to speak with media.

The tech majors had earlier complained to Unique ID Authority of being biased towards products of certain vendors (EMC Corp and Cisco). The authority postponed the bidding last month and made changes to the tender specifications after ET reported about a fiery meeting in the capital with the bidders.

The final five vendors submitted bids on Monday at UIDAI headquarters at Jeevan Bharti Building at Connaught Place in huge cartons. The timely selection of the IT vendor is critical to the success and implementation of the UIDAI project, which aims at giving 600 million Unique ID numbers by 2014.

"We decided to quit the bidding process on the request of our global headquarters. Things had become pretty hostile between us and the authority over the weeks," said an official at one the US-based tech majors which opted out. "Things had become pretty bad for us after we complained," said another top level official declining further comment.

Spokespersons of both IBM and HP declined to offer reasons why the companies opted out from participating in one of the most prestigious and large projects in India, even after submitting expressions of interest. Both companies got selected and participated in all pre-bids as well.

Another executive said his company decided to opt out because the chances to win the project were not as bright.

"It costs us over a million dollars to put in such a large bid as teams fly down from across the globe over many months. It's best we concentrate on projects where chances of winning are higher," he added.

UIDAI officials say it's up to the companies to bid. "Some who opted out have earlier participated as equipment vendors. We will take about three months to decide on the winner from the bidders," said a UIDAI spokesperson. The selected vendor will manage all IT infrastructure for the project. Only large firms with at least 4,000 people and sales of 6,000 crore in the last three years were allowed to bid.
Experts say that a good IT vendor is critical to success of such a project, which has failed in many countries.

"Aadhar is IT, there is no Aadhar without IT. India's issues are unique and this is not a large back-end, high technology project so a company must understand how to handle these problems," said Parminder Jeet Singh, director at Bangalore-based IT for Change.

India's UID project, will lead to $10 billion worth of investments in IT consulting, system integration, and computer hardware over the next five to six years, according to CLSA Research. The research firm sees a $1-billion business opportunity for consultant and need to raise manpower by 15% for their services. Some 18,000 systems specialists and programmers will drive a $2.4-billion pie for integration of UID into existing software systems.