In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, May 14, 2011

1299 - California drivers still waiting for new High Tech Licences

By Tonybizjack

Six months after California launched its new driver's license program, the company that won the $63 million contract is still struggling to fix production problems that have left tens of thousands of motorists waiting months for a new license.
Department of Motor Vehicles officials repeatedly have said they and their contractor, L-1 Identity Solutions of Massachusetts, are getting a handle on the situation.
But a Bee review of internal e-mails shows that problems actually got worse last month, when the production backlog at L-1's Sacramento factory reached its highest level since the card's October launch.

The problem involves the design of the license itself. Touted by the state as the most advanced identity card anywhere, California's new license is packed with security features to foil the most sophisticated counterfeiters.

The new cards contain hidden photos visible only by ultraviolet light. Drivers' signatures are in laser-engraved raised lettering. Each card has tiny perforations in the shape of a bear, seen when held to a light.

None of the design elements is new, state officials say, but the California license is the first anywhere to use them all at once.

Earlier this month, after the backlog briefly ballooned to 850,000 cards, DMV officials asked L-1 Identity Solutions to overhaul its efforts.
 
L-1 officials declined Bee requests to discuss the issue. DMV officials said L-1 is making some changes.
 
In a recent interview, DMV Director George Valverde declined to predict when the agency would be back to delivering licenses in a timely manner. "We are bringing (the delay) down, but it is not going to happen overnight," he said.
 
That's hardly satisfactory for Bob Amburn of Rancho Murieta. He paid his license fees on Nov. 17, but he didn't receive his new license until Saturday, four months later.
Amburn spent hours on the phone with the DMV, he said, and got so frustrated that he recently wrote a complaint to the governor.
 
"This vendor deal obviously was not worked out correctly," he said. "If they have problems they can't solve, then this wasn't ready for sale."
 
The delays have frustrated a few legislators too.
"We've heard about people standing in line an hour at DMV offices, then hearing: 'Sorry, can't help you,' " said Sen. Joe Simitian, D-Palo Alto, who has asked for an explanation from the DMV. "You pay your money and expect to get a product on a timely basis. DMV has come up well short of that."
 
Police stop just one worry
Some drivers, driving on expired cards, have expressed concerns about what will happen if they are pulled over by police. They complain about the lack of a clear statement from the DMV about what the problem is and what drivers with expired licenses should do.
 
DMV officials said police can check state computer files that will show if drivers have paid their license renewal fees, even if the driver doesn't have a new card in hand.
 
Some drivers also said they worry that they may not be allowed to fly if they arrive at the airport with an expired identity card. A federal Transportation Security Administration spokesman told The Bee that airport agents will accept temporary California licenses.
 
DMV officials say they have begun issuing automatic 90-day temporary licenses to everyone renewing their license or receiving a new one. They also set up an e-mail address and phone number for drivers to contact if they have been waiting six weeks or more for their license.
 
As of last week, 3,000 people had e-mailed the DMV, officials said. Yet, some drivers told The Bee that they had not received a response.

Annie Joe of Rocklin, who paid for her license renewal months ago but has yet to get a card, said her e-mail bounced back as undeliverable.
"It's no wonder DMV has a less than stellar reputation with Californians," she wrote in an e-mail to The Bee.
 
Technical errors cited
Citing security precautions, DMV officials have declined to describe the production problems in any detail, nor say in what ways the resulting cards were deemed substandard.
But heavily redacted documents reviewed by The Bee indicate DMV's contractor, L-1, has run into multiple issues at its factory with printers, engravers and laminating machines. There also have been problems with the process that creates photos viewable only via ultraviolet light. At times, human error allowed production runs of substandard cards. Workers have been reprimanded for poor performance.
 
Although DMV officials said they and L-1 conducted successful test production runs, hiccups began immediately after the October launch, delaying the first several deliveries to DMV by 12 days – even as officials were trumpeting the new cards at a news conference at their south Sacramento field office.
 
Those initial cards delivered to DMV "were 100 percent unacceptable," DMV official Shamim Khan said. "So we returned them."
 
Faced with demands to produce up to 40,000 new cards each day, and DMV requests to redo thousands more, L-1 expanded factory production to nights and weekends, yet fell further behind.
 
At one point, 21 percent of cards being produced did not meet standards and had to be remade, records show. In some cases, batches of remade cards also failed to meet standards.
 
DMV officials repeatedly expressed frustration to L-1, sometimes firing off e-mails by the hour. "Where is the quality control?" an official complained in November. 

Further problems elicited another lament: "I can't believe that there is a machine that allows these types of errors."
L-1 managers repeatedly apologized. "We understand the seriousness of this and the risk of problems and embarrassment that this type of error poses for DMV," an L-1 official wrote.
 
Another L-1 official, however, added: "It's not as easy as it might seem."
 
Difficulties a sore point
 
DMV informed L-1 in December that the company had breached its $63 million, five-year contract. As a result, DMV has not made payments to the vendor, Valverde said. "We have not paid a single dime and will not until they meet our standard."
 
Under contract terms, state officials say they can deduct 5 percent, or $3 million, for nonperformance.
 
L-1, one of two companies that bid for the job in 2009 (the two have since merged), is hardly a newcomer to the identity card industry. California officials said L-1 produces drivers licenses for 44 states.
 
The company also provides advanced security programs on an international level and lists among its customers the U.S. Departments of Defense and Homeland Security, and the United Arab Emirates.
 
DMV officials say they have maintained a good relationship with L-1, but letters suggest the two entities disagree over the difficulty of producing the new California card.
 
DMV officials point out the card's security elements have been produced successfully elsewhere, although not all in one card.
 
"It's state of the art, but it's demonstrated technology," Valverde said.
 
L-1 official Bob Eckel offered a different perspective in a letter to DMV. Calling the card "the most advanced in the nation," he wrote: "It is important to note that the security features that the DMV has requested as part of this contract are new innovations. As such, it will take some time to identify and resolve the root cause of the failure modes."
 
DMV officials said they have been briefing the Governor's Office. Simitian, the Senate budget subcommittee chairman, said he also is watching the project after constituents called to complain.
 
"A member of the public should not have to come to their senator to have a driver's license renewed," Simitian said. He has asked DMV for an update this spring.
 
DMV officials – noting that 3 million of the new licenses have been issued – say they're confident that their card design is realistic and that production glitches can be worked out.
"We had heart-to-heart talks," Valverde said. "Are we over-reaching? We have come to the conclusion that no, we are not."   


Read more: http://www.fresnobee.com/2011/03/20/2317144_p2/california-drivers-still-waiting.html#ixzz1MKKop1O2