In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

1316 - UID-enabled bank accounts in 2-3 months-Source- Live Mint

These accounts assume significance as govt, in future, may implement direct transfers of subsidies through banks

Surabhi Agarwal & Remya Nair
Posted: Tue, May 17 2011. 9:25 PM IST

New Delhi: India will see at least five million bank accounts being opened in the next two to three months, mostly in rural areas, thanks to the government’s ambitious Unique Identification (UID) or the Aadhaar programme, according to Ashok Pal Singh, deputy director general, Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI).

Also See | Bank Empanellment (PDF)

The programme, which gives out unique 12-digit UID numbers and maintains a database of the personal details of individuals, including biometric information, has thus far given out 6.58 million numbers. While enrolling people, one option it gives them is to open a bank account to which the UID number will be linked.

The UIDAI has empanelled a total of 64 banks of which 25 are state-owned banks, 12 private banks and one foreign bank. The rest are regional rural banks and cooperative banks. These banks—State Bank of India, ICICI Bank Ltd and Citibank are among them—will be given access to data of customers who have enrolled for Aadhaar and want to open a bank account.

According to Singh, around 80-85% of the people so far enrolled by UIDAI don’t have a bank account and have asked for one. According to the Reserve Bank of India data, only 40% of the country’s population has access to banking facilities. Singh and another UIDAI official, who also did not want to be named, said the banks would have to open the accounts within the next two to three months.

“Once the data is shared with the banks, they will have to open the accounts within one month,” said Singh.

A senior official from State Bank of India said the bank will be able to open accounts within the stipulated time frame. “We already open bank accounts in rural areas through our own branches. The only difference will be that volume of accounts will be higher when opened through Aadhaar. But we should be able to manage it using a mix of our branches and banking correspondents,” he said.

Aadhaar-linked bank accounts assume significance also because the government has set up a committee to look at the issue of direct transfers of subsidies and benefits. The committee is headed by UIDAI chairman Nandan Nilekani and is expected to submit its report by June. Indeed, UIDAI told the banks it was empanelling that their systems should facilitate direct transfers to the accounts of beneficiaries. “Apart from the clear benefits from the cash transfers of subsidy, Aadhaar-enabled bank accounts will bring large masses of people into the net of banking services; banks were earlier incapable of doing so (opening accounts) for the want of proper documentation,” said Sunil Chandiramani, partner and national leader, government services, at audit and consulting firm Ernst and Young, an adviser to the project. His reference is to so-called KYC, or know your customer norms that banks need to follow while opening an account. The government has since mandated that an Aadhaar number will suffice.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has said that banks will have to cover villages with a population of 2,000 and above by March 2012; this adds up to around 73,000 villages.

It asked banks to cover 20,000 villages in 2010-11 and the remaining 53,000 villages in 2011-12. In 2010-11, the banks covered 29,000 such villages.

People opting for a bank account while enrolling with UIDAI may not always be able to choose the bank that serves them. If a bank adopts a village under RBI’s financial inclusion plan or only one bank is empanelled in that area, then that is the bank that will serve customers in that area. In other areas, customers can choose between banks which are empanelled for that particular district.

surabhi.a@livemint.com