In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, June 16, 2011

1404 - Nandan Nilekani aims for 1m UID registration a day by Oct - Money Control

Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 21:35 |  Source : CNBC-TV18

Watch the CNBC TV Interview

The ambitious UID project headed by Nandan Nilekani has beaten its own enrollment guidance. While the UIDAI hopes to enrol 600 million people by 2014, it touched the 9.2 million mark on Wednesday. Nilekani talks to CNBC-TV18’s Shereen Bhan that he is confident of touching a million number a day coming October.
 
Below is the verbatim transcript of the interview. Also watch the accompanying video.
 
Q: You mentioned that you have beaten your own guidance. What is the current status? How many numbers have you rolled out?
A: As of Wednesday morning, we have enrolled 9.2 million people across 11 states. We have an online portal which tells you the status every morning.
 
Q: Will you be able to beat your guidance of reaching out to 600 million as well?
A: No. At this point, our goal is to meet our guidance. We have designed the architecture in way that it is scalable at the front-end and backend. By October, we will be at 1 million a day which is our other sort of guidance.
 
Q: We have discussed issues and apprehensions with regards to privacy and confidentiality. Since this project started, the mood has changed in two years decidedly with regards to whether this is the government’s way of tracking and targeting individuals. How are you combating or dealing with the scepticism and criticism? Some of the apprehensions that are being expressed are that the UID is meant to be voluntary, but it is not because government is now linking things like NREGS, etc to the UID, which makes it compulsory and not voluntary. What do you have to say about that?
A: UID gives an online ID which allows you to authenticate that ID in a mobile banking application or online web application. It is a very limited thing and it’s designed for giving benefits to people which has been well taken by everybody.
The 9.2 million people have received a letter from us with a number. Many of them have never had an identity in their lives and have now received an ID which enables them to open a bank account, get a mobile connection, etc.
People are seeing the value of this from the point of view of entitlements and benefits. A lot of the scepticism is tapering off.
 
Q: The next big hope or reform that everybody is talking about is linking the UID to the public distribution system with regards to LPG and kerosene. It is a three or four phased approach that the government is working on. Where do things currently stand on that front as you have had meetings with the oil minister?
A: The last budget announced the taskforce to look at subsidies in LPG, kerosene and fertilizer, not in food. It is not the PDS, but the non food activities.
We have had number of meetings and our interim report should be coming out in the next four weeks which will lay down the subsidy management architecture to distribute subsidies directly to people. These subsidies could either be cash subsidies or non-cash subsidies. We will architecturally provide for both.