In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, June 26, 2011

1437 - Sreelatha Menon: Who will catch the cop? by Sreelatha Menon-Business Standard

The Lok Pal Bill draft holds little for the aam aadmi who has to pay bribes for almost everything
 
Sreelatha Menon / New Delhi June 26, 2011, 0:30 IST

Last week, an enterprising resident welfare association in Ghaziabad organised a registration camp for unique identification (UID) numbers. It found people queuing up till midnight for a week with infants, grandmothers and some with domestic workers in tow.

No one had a clue as to how UID was different from the several other identity documents each of them had been scrupulously accumulating and treasuring. They were initially informed that all they needed to do was get their thumbs and eyes photographed. But it turned out that they also required to carry a proof of address and photo identification. UID is being considered as the government’s magic bullet to beat corruption in every sphere of society. A bigger solution than the Lok Pal, it is the super Lok Pal, says a resident.
 
No one knows how this is to happen. The enthusiasm of the government to give each citizen an UID is comparable with its lack of enthusiasm to open up the entire bureaucracy down to the constable to scrutiny under the Lok Pal/Lok Ayukta Bill, as proposed by activists led by Anna Hazare.

It did it once through the Right to Information Act. But it refuses to go any further. It wants to restrict it to the deputy secretary and upwards. Besides, it has no plans to have a central Lok Ayukta Bill which would cover state officials.

It is the scrutiny of the officials in the police, food department, transport, health and education departments which would bring relief to the common man.

If crores are looted during the Commonwealth Games, it makes people angry, but not as much as when they are asked to pay Rs 500 for the verification of their address for a passport by a constable.

Recently, the criminal investigation department (CID) and police officials in Ghaziabad’s Indirapuram area arrived for the verification of the address of a journalist for the purpose of an accreditation card to be issued by the Press Information Bureau (PIB). Both parties demanded Rs 500 each. The implication was that a denial would lead the PIB card to an unknown fate. The same happened when the cops and CID officials came to verify the address for the issuance of a passport.

Activists have demanded that a Lok Ayukta Bill be enacted as a Central legislation along with the Lok Pal Bill. Without a Lok Ayukta Bill with strong powers, it would be business as usual for the entities mentioned above.

Says social scientist Ashwini Kumar of the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, “It is important that the Lok Pal and Lok Ayukta have powers to take action.” He cites the example of the Bihar government, which recently seized the premises of an official accused of corruption and turned it into a school. It was, however, done after an approval was taken from the home ministry, as the official concerned was under the respective ministry. Citing the model of the Election Commission, which can marshal its resources when it wants, he says while the activists are looking for a radical interpretation of the Constitution, the government is focusing on centralised corruption. Instead of opening up the entire officialdom to scrutiny, it wants to rely on technological solutions such as UID for dealing with decentralised corruption. But, can 300 million people be protected from corruption with just a UID number, he asks.

Meanwhile, some residents queuing up for UID launched into arguments against the non-inclusion of the prime minister under Lok Pal, and began dissecting every scam that was in the news lately. Amid the heat, it is your turn for photographing your iris and your thumbs… under the UPA’s scheme for reaching out to the last man/woman on this land.