In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, June 24, 2011

1427 - Bathinda UID agency may have violated norms in sensitive data collection - Indian Express

Navjeevan Gopal
Posted: Fri Jun 24 2011, 03:29 hrs
Bathinda:

Firm denies wrongdoing, authority says need to examine whether violations have taken place

An empanelled enrolment agency of Unique Identification Authority of India may have violated the norms laid down by the authority and given collection of sensitive data from residents of Bathinda district to other firms.

Sources alleged Alankit Finsec Ltd, which is the empanelled agency for the demographic and biometric data collection for the 12-digit unique number Aadhaar, had given the work for Bathinda district to a person named Nitin Singla, who in turn sub-contracted it to some other local people.

As per the contract between Punjab Food and Civil Supplies Department, the registrar in the contract, and Alankit Finsec Ltd, the agency was to be paid Rs 30 per enrolment but sources alleged Alankit had outsourced it to Singla for Rs 14, who further sub-contracted it for cheaper rates to others.

But Singla denied the allegations and claimed he worked as a area manager with Alankit Finsec Ltd. “I am an employee of Alankit Finsec Ltd and no work has been outsourced by the agency nor it has been outsourced to me by the agency,” Singla claimed.

UIDAI pays Rs 50 to state government for every enrolment and leaves it to the state to decide on selecting the enrolment agency.

UIDAI Deputy Director General (Establishment) D Kumar maintained that as per the norms no outsourcing can be allowed. “But whether any violation has taken place is to be first seen by the registrar (Punjab Food and Civil Supplies Department) and by our office in Chandigarh,” he said

Punjab Food and Civil Supplies Director Alk Nanda Dyal said she would examine the matter. “I would go through the guidelines and examine the matter,” she said.

UIDAI Assistant Director General in Chandigarh, Charu Bali, said, “I am not sure whether it is a violation or not. It is a policy matter and officials from head office can better speak on this. It is, however, not practically possible for the enrolment agency to have all the required manpower on the company rolls. There are certain liberties to enrolment agencies and to certain extent the agencies can outsource manpower.”

However, the guidelines for selecting the enrolment agency in the Request for Quotation (RFQ) in the official website of UIDAI categorically states: “The supplier (read enrolment agency) shall not be permitted to sub-contract any part of its obligations, duties, or responsibilities under the contract.”

In Bokhra village, one Kunal Sharma, who claims to be a partner with Softel Systems, said they had been given the work to collect the data by Nitin Singla.

“We have been provided the equipment and are being paid Rs 9 per card for collecting the details,” Sharma told The Indian Express.

But Singla refuted Sharma’s claims and said he was also an employee of Alankit. “Only he (Kunal Sharma) knows why he said so (that work was outsourced to Softel Systems for Rs 9 per card),” he said.

Alankit, on its part, has claimed that there was nothing wrong in outsourcing work. “We are operating in 10 states of India. We cannot hire operators and manpower for the company in the each and every part. There is no bar in outsourcing the job to arrange the manpower for us. The equipments for carrying the job have been provided by us. Moreover, the salaries to the manpower are being paid by us,” Viney Chawla, company secretary of Alankit, said.

On whether the agency complied with guidelines related to labour laws, provident fund and minimum wages while utilising the services of such manpower, Chawla said, “It is the responsibility of the manpower provider.”

Probe in Muktsar

Sources said following a complaint that “behaviour of operators was not resident friendly”, the UIDAI has initiated a probe in Muktsar district. Sources alleged that the enrolment agency, which is collecting the demographic and biometric data of residents in Muktsar, is also an Alankit group company. “Yes, there is a complaint that residents are not able to talk to officials of enrolment agency in Muktsar and are not being guided properly. We are looking into the complaint,” Bali said.