In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, June 11, 2011

1387 - Citi Is Slapped With More Sanctions-Source- Wall Street Journal

MAY 7, 2011

By JOKO HARIYANTO And ERIC BELLMAN

JAKARTA, Indonesia—Indonesia's central bank banned Citigroup Inc. from opening new branches for one year and imposed other sanctions following its investigations into the alleged embezzlement of millions of dollars by a Citi employee and the suspicious death of a Citibank borrower.

Bank Indonesia on Friday also said it may revoke Citi's license to do business in Indonesia if its probe of the bank turns up further problems.

 Customers at a Jakarta, Indonesia, branch, one of 21 Citibank
outlets in the Asian nation.

The bank also specified the duration of bans on the bank from certain new business. The bank will be barred from issuing new credit cards for two years and recruiting new wealth-management clients to its Citigold service for one year. The central bank had announced these bans last month but not the length.

The central bank also said it imposed an offshore travel ban on some of the unit's executives while investigations continue.

The sanctions represent a significant blow to one of the largest foreign banks operating in Southeast Asia's biggest economy. Citi, which has been expanding into Indonesia's banking market, has 4,000 employees, 21 bank branches and 71 consumer-finance offices there. Its Indonesian revenue is an estimated $300 million.

"Bank Indonesia has found the bank violated its own internal procedures, as well as weaknesses in its implementation of risk management," Bank Indonesia Deputy Gov. Budi Rochadi said at a news conference Friday. The central bank didn't provide any other details of what it had discovered through its investigation.

In a statement from its New York headquarters, Citigroup said it is "committed to working closely with Bank Indonesia and taking the actions necessary to satisfy their concerns," and "will continue to implement the appropriate corrective actions in consultation with our regulator." A Citigroup spokesman in New York declined to comment on the threat to revoke its license.

"We have already taken steps to strengthen our internal control processes," said Ditta Amahorseya, director of corporate affairs for Citigroup's Indonesian operations.

The crackdown on Citi illustrates the risks of expansion into emerging markets, where there may be less control over far-flung branches, analysts said. More than 60% of the revenue and 70% of profits at Citicorp's core banking operations come from abroad.

"Citi definitely is seeing its reputation being tarnished," said Bret Ginesky, Jakarta-based banking analyst for CLSA. He said he expects the restrictions will slow Citi's expansion and drive customers to other banks.

Last month, Citi said it had hired more than 1,400 debt-collection staff in Indonesia after the country's central bank criticized it for outsourcing that function. Bank Indonesia said Friday that Citi wouldn't be allowed to outsource its debt collection services for two years.

A string of bad news started for Citi back in February, when the central bank and police launched probes into Citi's operations after the bank alerted regulators to suspicious transactions conducted by relationship manager Inong Malinda Dee. The manager was detained on March 23 and charged with stealing at least 17 billion rupiah ($2 million) from clients after obtaining signed blank checks from them.

In April, police launched an investigation into the death of a Citi client who died after meeting with debt collectors hired by Citi. The circumstances surrounding the death of Irzen Octa, the secretary-general of the National Unity Party, one of Indonesia's minor political parties, remain unclear. Some police at the time said his body showed signs of injury.

Citi said an internal investigation into the matter found no evidence of violence against the customer.

Last week, the central bank asked more than 20 other banks to stop accepting new wealth-management clients for a month as it reviewed how these accounts were being used.

—I-Made Sentana and Randall Smith contributed to this article.
 
Write to Eric Bellman at eric.bellman@wsj.com