In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

4413 - City schools demand Aadhaar for fee payment - TNN


City schools demand Aadhaar for fee payment
Clara Lewis and Shreya Bhandary TNN . Mumbai Times.6.7.2013

Mumbai: The state government, after achieving 80% registration for Aadhaar cards in Mumbai, is leaning on private schools to prod affluent sections of society to register for a unique identification (UID) number, for its last-mile completion. 

    Many ICSE/CBSE board schools are refusing to accept fees unless parents produce the Aadhaar number or proof that they have applied for one. 

    A parent, whose child is in a CBSE school in the suburbs, said she was turned away when she went to pay monthly fees. “They categorically told me that fees would be accepted only if I brought the Aadhaar card along.’’ 

    Another parent whose child studies in an ICSE school said she had paid term fees by cheque in June and bus fees for the first semester. Neither cheque was cleared till Thursday. 

    But J S Saharia, additional chief secretary, school education, said, “While we have told schools to ensure that every child has a number, there is no compulsion.” The coercion is seen on other fronts too, like with salary credits at Mantralaya.

State govt under pressure over Aadhaar 
    At Mantralaya, the finance department has issued an oral order not to credit salaries of those who do not have a number, sources said. Chief secretary J K Banthia was not available for comment despite repeated attempts. 

    The state government is clearly under pressure from the Centre to implement the direct benefit transfer (DBT) project. Thirty-two schemes funded by the Centre are to be implemented through DBT. In Maharashtra, 12 schemes have been selected for the project. The schemes are mostly around student scholarships. 

    During the last legislative assembly session, chief minister Prithviraj Chavan, faced with criticism over poor implementation of UID registrations and opposition from legislators to the online transfer of money, had said that unless a district achieves 85% registration, the schemes will not be shifted online. The state government wants to implement and showcase the DBT project, keeping in mind the 2014 general elections. 

    But the move has no legal sanctity as the bill is not passed by Parliament.
    While schools have been receiving circulars from the education department, making it clear that Aadhaar cards have to be compulsory for staff, students and parents, only aided schools have taken them seriously. 

    “For aided schools, the entire system of salary payment has been converted from manual to online, therefore we have no choice but to ensure that our Aadhaar cards are in place,” said Sangeeta Srivastava, principal, KES School, Kandivli (W). She said schools have also been told to inform parents to apply for cards at the earliest. 

    “The education department has been asking for school records and checking if teachers have applied for the cards but they haven’t taken any decision. I’m sure soon they’ll stop salary payment if we don’t comply,” said Rekha Shahani, principal, Kamla High School in Khar (W). 

    Some ICSE schools told TOI they are yet to receive any notification from the education department. 

    Poonam Jaiswal, principal, Lakshdham High School (ICSE) in Goregaon (E), said even though schools have not received the circular, education officials have stated at meetings, that Aadhaar cards will be important. 

    “We have been told that students who wish to apply for scholarships have to open a bank account and have a UID number. We have informed parents about it,” said Jaiswal. 

    An April 18, 2011 GR had listed instructions for schools and colleges, and a copy was pasted on the Thane Zilla Parishad pay unit notice board, making it clear that teachers who haven’t applied for cards will not receive salaries. Many teachers had protested and the notice was pulled out. A school had threatened to confiscate Class X students’ board exam hall tickets if they failed to apply for Aadhaar cards.