In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

4414 - Ministry to decide whether Aadhaar e-KYC norm valid or not-Business Standard



Doubts over whether PMLA needs to be amended or IT Act put electronic KYC on par with physical verification

Several months after it was launched with much fanfare, the Unique Identification Authority of India’s (UIDAI) ambitious plan to substitute physical verification with electronic KYC as a means to avail government services including opening bank accounts is yet to take off as there are doubts on the current legal sanctity of it.

The matter has now been referred to law ministry for an opinion.

While the authority’s is arguing that the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) doesn’t need to be amended to make e-KYC legal as the Information Technology Act already permits it, the Finance ministry agrees but says that the PMLA Rules will have to be changed. Meanwhile, banks which have to finally implement it have a completely different concern – security.

An official of UIDAI, which is implementing the Aadhaar or the UID project, said that according to the Section 3 of the Information Technology Act of the country, any physical document is equal to the electronic record so PMLA doesn’t need to be amended. “But, to be sure the matter has been referred to the law ministry, which will give its view soon,” the official added.

The person, who did not wish to be identified, added that though finance ministry and UIDAI are on the same page on the issue, the matter has been referred to the law ministry to just get some clarity.

When implemented, the e-KYC will enable citizens to open a bank account by just giving their Aadhaar number and authenticating themselves using their biometrics as the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has notified the Aadhaar number as a valid proof of address and identity. The information sent by the bank to the UID server will verify whether the information given is authentic or not. The service can also be used to avail of other government services which require authentication.  

A finance ministry official said that amendment in the PMLA would not be required as it is already covered under Information Technology Act. Another official added that for the purpose of allowing online authentication of Aadhaar only the PMLA Rules would need to be changed and not the Act.

“There is no need to go to Parliament as this issue can be addressed through the Rules. We are working on it,” the official told Business Standard.

While making its case for e-KYC, UIDAI has been arguing that it will save administrative costs as banks and other government departments incur huge expenditure while storing and verifying physical documents. It will also be more fool-proof as compared to paper records which can be easily forged, it says.

Also, given the government’s current push towards roll out of the direct cash transfer project in the country, if approved, e-KYC could also fast track seeding of bank accounts with the Aadhaar number to ensure smooth linkage with the Aadhaar payment bridge which will facilitate the flow of government subsidy money directly into the back accounts of the beneficiaries.

While bankers agree with the possible advantages of e-KYC, security concerns are denting their confidence in the new system. An executive director with a public sector bank said the bank will be more comfortable if the information sits on its server.

“There should be proper security. The government is trying to work out a solution.” The person added that the benefits of e-KYC could not be ignored as it would save substantial space on the servers of the banks and help in faster seeding of Aadhaar with bank accounts.

“It is feasible but the only question is whether to use our system for authentication of Aadhaar or to use UIDAI’s system. Both the systems are different and the government is trying to integrate those,” said an executive director with another state-run bank.


He added security of the data was the biggest concern of the banks in e-KYC as the UIDAI system has not been tested yet, and thus banks want the authentication to pass through their security gateway. On its part, UIDAI is assuring banks that upon receiving the customer’s consent, the authority can enable the KYC data to be stored on the banks servers also.