In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

4387 - A small step for market pricing - Business Standard


... could become a giant leap towards lasting reform if the experiment in direct benefit transfers for cooking gas subsidies pans out

On June 1, the government took a little-noticed step towards changing the mechanics of cooking gas distribution that could mark a great leap forward for the contentious oil subsidy regime. It launched a programme covering 18 of the country’s 600-odd districts to credit the subsidy (the difference between the retail and market price) on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) cylinders directly into the accounts of 6.7 million consumers with bank accounts linked to the Aadhaar (unique identification) number.

Known as the direct benefit transfer (DBT), it is part of a change that is nothing short of a revolution in the LPG economy under the United-Progressive Alliance-II government involving 140 million consumers, three oil marketing companies and some 11,500 distributors. All this has come about without much protest, agitation or the slightest rethink. The government even took the plunge and sacrificed its alliance with the Trinamool Congress last September when it decided to put in place a quota of six subsidised cylinders instead of an unlimited number that was available to consumers till then.

DBT might appear to be a simple process in which a consumer gets a credit into his bank account the moment he books a cylinder, so long it is within his quota of nine subsidised cylinders. But it is being made possible through a complicated web of processes that is still at an experimental stage.

At its simplest, this is how it works. Consumers get an Aadhaar number and visit a bank branch to open an account if they do not have one. If they already have a bank account, then the Aadhaar number has to be linked with that bank account either at the branch or through a request form available with LPG distributors. The Aadhaar number is provided to the distributors for linking it with the LPG consumer’s number.

Although the penetration of Aadhaar numbers in these districts is 90 per cent, the proportion of Aadhaar numbers linked to bank accounts is just over 20 per cent and the linkage between the LPG consumer numbers and Aadhar is almost 60 per cent. In the first month of DBT, some 1.5 million transactions involving a subsidy transfer of Rs 60.47 crore have taken place. (On July 1, Mysore district was included in the programme.)

It is the next stage in the slow but steady oil subsidy reform process that began in October last year that might be challenging. Customers know that anything beyond the quota will cost them Rs 750 instead of Rs 399. Though the quota for non-subsidised cylinders was capped at nine in January this year, the introduction of a limit introduced domestic cooking gas consumers to the concept of market pricing. Currently, a consumer is charged 96 per cent more for non-subsidised cylinders that are selling at Rs 802 in New Delhi, so the difference is steep. With the introduction of DBT, consumers will pay the market price for all cylinders and take the differential for nine cylinders as subsidy in their bank accounts.

Such a system makes it possible for the government to have a different subsidy scale for different sets of consumers depending on their income levels . This also creates the opportunity to close the subsidy tap for the affluent. Though the government currently has not expressed such an intention yet, as it stands today, a consumer has a choice of not availing of the subsidy on cooking gas, something that was not possible even till few years back. Besides, with Aadhaar becoming mandatory in the 18 districts from September 1 this year, some consumers might be left out of the subsidy net altogether.

DBT is not a one-off programme. In the run-up to its introduction, the government-controlled oil marketing companies launched a transparency portal that allowed customers to view the number of cylinders that were booked in their name. For a year now, the transparency portals of the Indian Oil Corporation, Hindustan Petroleum and Bharat Petroleum have been acting as a safeguard against bogus bookings and the diversion of commercial purposes of the 14.2 kg cylinder meant for domestic consumption. Before the portal was launched, a “de-duplication” exercise was conducted, through which LPG connections were limited to one per individual. Alongside came the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas order that made holding more than one domestic LPG connection per household punishable. An exemption was made only for those addresses where there is more than one kitchen.

The de-duplication exercise was conducted across a database of 140 million customers, and 25 million connections were found to either have the same name and address or the same address and different names. To check multiple connections, the government asked consumers to fill up Know-Your-Customer forms by November 30, last year. In all, 6.3 million customers did not respond. They were given three months’ notice, after which their connections were blocked.

This year, the government expects to save Rs 8,000 crore through the exercise. The total revenue loss for oil marketing companies in selling below market price was Rs 39,558 crore last year but the full benefit of capping of subsidised cylinders will bring in savings in subsidy this year. During the first six months ending January 2013 of the introduction of the cap, government-controlled oil marketing companies reported an almost two per cent drop in domestic LPG consumption, against a growth of almost seven per cent in the same period in 2011-12. In contrast, industrial LPG sales grew 12.5 per cent during September 2012-January 2013 against 5.4 per cent the previous year. Overall LPG consumption in 2012-13 grew a mere 1.6 per cent against over seven per cent in 2011-12. This year started with companies recording a drop of 1.2 per cent in domestic LPG sales in April.

From the government’s perspective, the two-point agenda of controlling subsidies and channelling it better appears well within its reach. For this, changes have been made in how cooking gas is priced and delivered, and how subsidy is disbursed. This systemic overhaul might have caused some public inconvenience but the fact remains that the LPG distribution network is being geared up for market pricing in cooking gas. In India, that’s equivalent to a Great Leap Forward.