In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, July 14, 2013

4423 - ‘EU won’t budge on data privacy in trade talks with US’


Video: US, EU negotiators hail positive first round of trade talks

WASHINGTON, JULY 13:  

The European Union will stand its ground on issues of data privacy, its chief negotiator said on Friday as the United States and EU ended the first week of talks on a potentially monumental free-trade agreement.

“We do not intend to compromise,” Ignacio Garcia Bercero said in answer to a reporter’s question at a press briefing.

He said talks on the issue would not put “into question data privacy standards of the EU.” The comment was the only public hint of discord from Bercero and US lead negotiator Dan Mullaney, who said the week had seen a successful gathering in Washington of negotiating groups on more than 15 issues.

The Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) talks have been more than a year in the planning. The aim is to create the world’s largest free-trade zone by knocking down the average 4 per cent tariffs and, more importantly, clearing away regulatory discrepancies that now inhibit trade.

To allay European concerns about espionage, the sides have agreed to hold parallel talks on the spying allegations arising from documents leaked by fugitive US intelligence contractor Edward Snowden.

In the days before talks opened on Monday, some European officials urged suspension of the trade talks. But the pressing need for economic growth in recession-plagued Europe and the interest by the US in gaining easier access to the EU market won out.

“Spying or no spying, we need more trade,” Danish Minister for Economic and Interior Affairs Margrethe Vestager said this week.

She said the prospect of growth and more trade was “of course very important for all of us in Europe.” Mullaney said that each of the negotiating groups met to identify “what they needed to do to make progress between now and the second round” slated for in October in Brussels.

Mullaney and Bercero said that considerable time had been devoted to agriculture, expected to be the thorniest issue in the talks.

“Certainly this is a conversation we will be ready to continue,” Bercero said.

The US-EU economic relationship is already the world’s largest, representing 30 per cent of global trade.

If a deal is reached on both tariff and non-tariff regulatory issues, that fraction could grow to nearly half of global economic output, serving a combined population of 800 million.

Among the most contentious agriculture issues are the use and labelling of genetically modified products, as well as EU bans on growth hormones in cattle and so-called chlorinated chicken.

The trade deal offers the prospect of up to 2 million new jobs, according to Germany’s Bertelsmann Foundation. Gross domestic product could be boosted by 0.9 per cent in the EU and 0.8 per cent in the US, according to the Centre for Economic Policy Research.

(This article was published on July 13, 2013)


Keywords: European Union, US, US-EU trade talks, data privacy, free-trade agreement, Ignacio Garcia Bercero, Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership, US-EU economic relationship