In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, July 29, 2013

4435 - Benefits scheme battles systemic quagmire



Surabhi Agarwal  |  New Delhi  July 20, 2013 Last Updated at 00:43 IST

Lack of coordination, bureaucratic lethargy, banking linkages come in the way

The ambitious direct cash transfer scheme kicked off with much fanfare on January 1 this year. However, the complex project is turning out to be a victim of ill-planning, hurried execution and lack of coordination.

According to a Cabinet minister closely involved with the project, the successful implementation of Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) for cooking gas subsidy has shown the technology behind DBT works and is scalable. "However, other schemes are just prodding along because of systemic problems."

The minister added the response so far has been so low because among the top five welfare schemes under the entitlement programme, only scholarships was taken up in the first phase, which stands in the fifth position. While the largest scheme, the Public Distribution System, has not been included at all, the second largest - cooking gas - has recently come on-board, while the third on the list, MGNREGS (job guarantee scheme) is still not ready. From pensions (fourth largest), only three schemes were added, last week. "In most of the current schemes under DBT, transactions are episodic. If cooking gas, MGNREGS and pension schemes were on board from the beginning, better value could have been derived from the project so far." (THE SPREAD OF DBT)

Business Standard spoke to over half a dozen officials working at the field level and most said while at the fundamental level, the scheme is surely a "game-changer", an unprecedented level of coordination is required to make it work. "There are some schemes which have migrated their systems on the DBT platform on their own initiative and are doing very well," said a government official working with the project. "At the end, it boils down to which state/district/department really has the intent to roll it out," added another.

Even as the second phase has been flagged off, which covers one-fifth of the country, there are recurring challenges such as penetration of Aadhaar, lack of cooperation from banks, issues in seeding the account number with Aadhaar and digitising of databases. (KEY ISSUES WITH DBT)

Jairam Ramesh, Union minister for rural development, said some districts are doing well and the big issue is with banks, which are not cooperating much. "There is confusion regarding the fee which the banking correspondents will be paid and the model of multiple banking correspondents with multiple banks has not happened yet."

The minister stressed that the aim should be to route all transactions through the Aadhaar-based platform to have a real impact. In some schemes, money is being directly transfered to the bank accounts as their seeding with Aadhaar is taking time. However, the linkage with Aadhaar is essential to eradicate ghosts and fakes from the system.

Ramesh said issues have also cropped up with states like Tamil Nadu raising alarm over the Centre trying to bypass them by directly transferring payments to people. However, that is not the intention.

Despite the fact that the government has pulled out all stops to roll out the scheme, "in some cases it is just bureaucratic lethargy," is acting as an impediment.

Browsing at the latest numbers in a particular state and looking somewhat disappointed at what propped up at the computer screen, one government official sighed and remarked: "In some districts, the administrators claim they are not able to locate the beneficiaries. These are the same people who know their territory like the back of their hand. Maybe the project has now started touching where it hurts the most - at the lowest level of corruption in the country."

LPG: Cooking a success story

Within six weeks of its rollout in about 20 districts, cooking gas subsidy transfers recorded 2.3 million transactions with Rs 90 crore sent directly into the Aadhaar-linked bank accounts of consumers, turning it into a DBT success story. The scheme’s “technological high ground” worked in its favour, say experts and officials.
The database of LPG consumers had been fed into computers since 2000. Though the list was “primitive and corrupt,” the exercise to clean it up had started few years ago. However, most other schemes are still struggling with digitising databases. Moreover, its supply chain, to the last mile of delivery is automated.

As a result, from zero per cent seeding of beneficiary bank accounts with their Aadhaar number in December last year, the ministry could scale up to 65 per cent as of now. Though it has been able to migrate only 35 per cent of its target base on DBT, it claims to have already saved roughly Rs 2,000 crore by blocking allegedly 6.3 million bogus connections.


However, officials say the support of banks in seeding Aadhaar and delivering the payments to the consumers in un-banked areas, consumer awareness and, finally, penetration of Aadhaar will pose challenges even in their case if they have to expand the scheme to the whole of India.