In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, June 6, 2015

8085 - Editorial: Reining in subsidies - Financial Express

Getting the SECC data will be a big step forward

By: The Financial Express | May 31, 2015 11:56 pm

Petroleum minister Dharmendra Pradhan is right when he says that direct cash transfers in kerosene subsidies, the next item on his agenda, will not be as easy as in the case of LPG where the government was able to weed out 4 crore bogus customers once it linked LPG connections to Aadhaar-seeded and unseeded bank accounts. 

In the case of LPG, all supplies were made by 3 PSU oil companies, Aadhaar was centrally- run and you had PSU banks—in other words, all the possible levers were under the control of the central government. If direct benefit transfers didn’t work in the case of LPG, the government had only itself to blame. 

In the case of kerosene, which accounted for a third of the R72,000-crore under-recovery of oil PSUs in FY15—as Pradhan has pointed out in his FE interview— it is the state governments that have to identify the beneficiaries. To that extent, the Centre is dependent upon the progress made by the states in identifying beneficiaries. Indeed, that is the problem faced in moving to cash transfers in the case of food subsidies—the states have not come up with their lists of the beneficiaries, after which the latter have to be connected to bank accounts that are linked to their Aadhaar numbers.

Getting states to identify the poor has been an uphill task and the Socio Economic and Caste Census (SECC) has been going on since 2011—a total of 13 socio-economic parameters, like size of land-holding and type of house, were to be used to identify the poor. While a draft list is ready for 624 of the country’s 640 districts, a final list is available for only 200. 

A large part of the government’s effort over the past year has been to pressurise states to finalise the lists and, as FE has reported, at one stage, the prime minister’s office even directed that states which do not have a final list will be supplied grain at above-poverty-line prices under the National Food Security Act—rice at Rs 7.9 a kg and wheat at R6.1 per kg as compared to Rs 3 and Rs 2 per kg, respectively, for the poor. 

The final list is now likely to be available next week and this will be a big step forward in reducing subsidies. How much subsidy will be cut will depend upon how many poor people the SECC finally comes up with, but the subsidy outgo will be restricted to just this list. 

Over a period of time, and this is where the real benefits will come in, the government will have to link these names to Aadhaar numbers and to Aadhaar-seeded bank accounts—only when this is done can de-duplication be done, which is how 4 crore users were eliminated from the LPG subscriber list. 

Apart from the big benefits the government will get once bogus subscribers are weeded out, getting the list is very important since, based on NSS data, on average, around half the food subsidy does not reach the poor. Once the poor are identified, however, with well-designed programmes using mobile apps for instance—the poor can SMS how much grain they got to a pre-specified number—it will be possible to ensure that they get their full grain and other allotments.

First Published on June 1, 2015 12:26 am