In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, June 13, 2015

8132 - Jan Dhan rolls on, but ‘dhan’ in accounts slow to accrue - The Hindu

BENGALURU, June 11, 2015


BAGESHREE S.

About 47 per cent of bank accounts opened under the Pradhan Mantri Jan-Dhan Yojana in Karnataka have zero balance

Banks in Karnataka have gone about creating no-frills accounts under the Pradhan Mantri Jan-Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) with great zeal and created close to 72 lakh accounts since August 15, 2014. The difficult task, however, has been ensuring transactions through the accounts, with nearly half of them categorised as ‘zero-balance’ accounts as of now.

Massive drive

Statistics accessed through SyndicateBank, Karnataka’s nodal bank for the scheme, shows that banks in Karnataka created 71.68 lakh accounts under the PMJDY between August 15, 2014 and May 23, 2015. Of them, 33.88 lakh are zero-balance accounts, which translates to 47.27 per cent.

K. Preetam Lal, General Manager of SyndicateBank, said population in the State yet to have bank account was “less than one per cent”, which includes migrant workers and people in very remote areas. He said the banks had not insisted on opening with a balance in the first phase, but the next target was making them operational, which they hope to achieve by the year-end.

A micro reading of the zero-balance accounts across districts under this much-talked-about financial inclusion mission throws up some interesting patterns. Predictably, many districts with over 50 per cent zero-balance accounts lie in north Karnataka, with Bagalkot (61.19 per cent), Haveri (60.64 per cent), Koppal (57.95 per cent), Vijayapura (56.64 per cent) and Ballari (56.42 per cent) among the toppers.

The contrast

However, it is Bengaluru Rural district that has the maximum number of zero-balance accounts (81.15 per cent). In contrast, Bengaluru Urban district has the least number of zero-balance accounts, at 29.87 per cent.

OD, but only with Aadhaar
People opening the PMJDY account are entitled to overdraft (OD) facility, but conditions apply. The account-holder should have “satisfactory” transaction for six months and he/she should be the head of the family. Another important condition is that he/she should mandatorily have an Aadhaar card, which is important for “reasons of regulation”. As of now, of the 71.68 lakh accounts, 41.25 lakh are Aadhaar-seeded accounts.

Reluctance for RuPay card
A PMJDY card holder is entitled to a RuPay debit card, but a substantial number of those who are entitled for the cards do not appear to be interested in taking them. As per the records, though 63.79 lakh debit cards have been issued, banks have reported that about 20 per cent of them have not been collected by beneficiaries.
* Total number of PMJDY accounts in State: 71,68,528
* Total number of accounts with zero balance: 33,88,737
* Total number of Aadhaar-seeded accounts: 41,25,839
* Total balance in accounts: Rs. 641.93 crore
* RuPay debit cards issued: 63,79,177