AADHAAR RELATED ARTICLES: 8118 - Undertake comprehensive pan-India assessment of migration patterns: Jayalalitha to NITI Aayog -

In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.

On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.

In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.

In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.

In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.

"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi

Ram Krishnaswamy

Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, June 9, 2015

8118 - Undertake comprehensive pan-India assessment of migration patterns: Jayalalitha to NITI Aayog -

Undertake comprehensive pan-India assessment of migration patterns: Jayalalitha to NITI Aayog

KNN Bureau | 08 06 2015 04:51:03 PM IST

Chennai, June 8 (KNN) Tamil Nadu chief minister J Jayalalithaa has suggested the NITI aayog to undertake a comprehensive pan-India assessment of migration patterns, needs and aspirations and then formulate requisite policy interventions for both providers and absorbers of migrant labour.

Jayalalitha on Sunday wrote a letter to her Punjab counterpart and chairman of the sub-group of chief ministers, Prakash Singh Badal on skill development of Niti Aayog highlighting the points to be included in the draft report of the committee.

In her letter, Jayalalithaa thanked Badal for the invitation extended to her to attend the second meeting of Niti Aayog at Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

She said, “In the first meeting of the sub group held on 25 April, 2015, Tamil Nadu's views had been presented in detail. Skill development is a very important issue for the country as a whole and we, in Tamil Nadu have been taking a number of initiatives in this crucial area. I have read the draft report that has been circulated and I am happy to note that many of the suggestions made by Tamil Nadu have found place in the draft report.'

However, she reiterated some other suggestions were missing in the report.

The release quoted her suggestion saying, “The draft report in para 2.4.2 refers to addressing the issue of skill development in demographically advantaged states. Taking cognizance of the heterogeneity of demographic challenges and opportunities across different sates, targeted interventions need to be devised by broadly classifying the states as net suppliers and net absorbers of labour.”

"One of the recommendations should be to undertake a comprehensive pan-India assessment of migration patterns, needs and aspirations, based on which requisite policy interventions for both providers and absorbers of migrant labour can be formulated," Jayalalithaa said in her letter.

“It is a matter of national priority to address the productivity gaps of the demographically mature sates like Tamil Nadu, lest their populations grow old without fully enjoying the fruits of growth and development. Hence, the report needs to focus on this aspect as well. In this light, one of the recommendations should be to undertake a comprehensive pan-India assessment of migration patterns, needs and aspirations, based on which requisite policy interventions for both oroviders and absorbers of migrant labour can be formulated,” she wrote.

Seeking clarity on the implementation of skill development projects nationwide, Jayalalithaa said, "It would be desirable for the central government agencies including NSDC (National Skill Development Corporation) to confine themselves to national level standardization, provision of financing and policy and legislative frameworks."

"Actual training delivery should be routed through and monitored by state government agencies which are better placed to mobilise candidates for training," she said.

On identification of skill development strategy on sector wise basis, she said, "This is clearly a task best done at the state level since the priority sectors would vary from state to state."

She said Union and ministry of skill development should intensify efforts towards universal adoption of the National Skills Qualification Framework and clarify its linkage with the National Vocational Education Qualification Framework.

Noting that there is no mention of issues relating to persons with disabilities, Jayalalithaa said, this is a key omission. A recommendation stating "to ensure that persons with disabilities are effectively skilled, it is essential to identify skill training partners who have the requisite expertise and infrastructure to provide the specialized training" should be included in the report. (KNN Bureau)