In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

8639 - Editorial: Making Jan-Dhan viable - Financial Express

As DBT spreads, the accounts will become viable

By: The Financial Express | August 31, 2015 12:21 AM

RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan is right when he said, in the RBI Annual Report, that the government needed to compensate public sector banks for undertaking ‘public interest activities’. PSU banks have, based on the Prime Minister’s exhortation, opened a total of 17.7 crore bank accounts under the Pradhan Mantri Jan-Dhan Yojana. Since banks would probably not have opened these accounts under the normal course—the account-holders typically don’t have enough balances to justify the costs of opening the account—it is only fair that banks be compensated for this. According to the Indian Banks’ Association, it costs around Rs 140 to open each account, implying that PSU banks have spent around R2,500 crore to meet a government diktat.

While it is not clear if the banks are going to be compensated for this, the plan was to make the accounts self-financing, and not to remain a burden, unlike most of the earlier ‘no-frills accounts’ that PSU banks were forced to open. 

The DBT scheme was the key to this. Right now, the central government alone spends around Rs 3 lakh crore a year on various social security schemes. 

If physical transfers—like PDS rations—are replaced with cash transfers to these accounts, they will become viable immediately. Whether it takes one or two years to get DBT going for all social security schemes is unclear—and that also depends upon the Supreme Court’s view on Aadhaar—but banks will earn a substantial sum from having R3 lakh crore in the till once this is done. 

According to Kotak Institutional Equities, a fourth of the 98 crore bank accounts in the country are bare-basic ones that have just R31,000 crore of deposits in them—that’s a mere 1.5% of the total deposits base in the country. 

Compared to this, when direct transfers are working as per plan, the Jan-Dhan accounts will be quite lucrative for banks. 

And if the government decides to pay a commission on these transfers—the Nandan Nilekani-led taskforce on this had suggested a 3.14% commission since banks would also need to pay commissions to the banking correspondents—that will be in addition to what they will earn from the till.

According to a government press release on the first anniversary of the Jan-Dhan Yojana, good progress has already been made. While these bank accounts already have deposits of over Rs 22,000 crore, over 40% of them have also been seeded with Aadhaar, and are therefore ready for DBT. Some progress has already been made on putting money in through the banking system via LPG subsidies—and the government is planning pilot schemes for PDS as well. Which is why the number of zero-balance accounts has fallen from 76% on September 2014 to under 46% already—indeed, more than 1 million have been found eligible for availing of a Rs 5,000 overdraft facility as well. For a one-year old programme, that’s an impressive start. And while Governor Rajan is correct in asking the government to compensate banks for undertaking public interest activities, Jan-Dhan may turn out to be a profitable activity for banks—provided the DBT scheme proceeds on schedule.

First Published on August 31, 2015 12:21 am