In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, September 21, 2015

8721 - Aadhaar not mandatory, but people being harassed - Sunday Guardian


In 2013, the Supreme Court had maintained that no person should be prevented from availing services for not possessing the non-mandatory Aadhaar card.

NAVTAN KUMAR  New Delhi | 19Th Sep 2015



adhaar cards are turning out to be a big harassment for people as they are being asked to get them to avail different services. This is happening despite the Supreme Court maintaining for the past two years that an Aadhaar card is not mandatory.

Complaints are pouring in from different quarters about the hardships people are facing in availing services like banking and getting LPG cylinders in the absence of Aadhaar cards as they are being sought for almost every official work. In March this year, the Delhi government issued a notification insisting that couples require Aadhaar cards to get their marriages registered under the Special Marriage Act.

What has made matters worse is that Aadhaar cards are being demanded even for the registration of newborn babies. As if that is not enough, many schools have started asking their students to get themselves registered for Aadhaar cards. Kendriya Vidyalaya had asked its students to get their Aadhaar numbers registered with the bank which collects the fees. "I got a circular from the school saying that the students need to fill up forms for Aadhaar card registration. I found this quite absurd. I checked with the school and I was told that it was being done under the instructions of the UP government," said Anil Sharma, whose child studies in a CBSE-affiliated Ghaziabad-based school.

According to Nalin Srivastava, a resident of Dwarka, he recently got an SMS from his LPG distributor asking him to submit his Aadhaar number with the LPG ID and his bank account if he wanted to avail the subsidy. "I cannot understand what this fuss is all about. Why should I get an Aadhar card if it is not mandatory?" wondered Srivastava.

Such complaints are pouring in from different quarters. For those who are willing to get their Aadhar cards made, there is another problem. "I don't know how to get it done. There are special camps for Aadhaar registration. Once I went to a camp, but since there was a long queue, I had to return. Now I have no idea," said Ankur Verma, a resident of Noida.

The Supreme Court had asked the government last month to publicise widely the fact that Aadhaar was optional and not mandatory for the citizens. The apex court had also directed the government that an Aadhaar card would not be used for any other purpose other than the public distribution scheme. This was not the first time the Supreme Court had clarified on the issue. Earlier this year, the apex court said that officials found insisting on Aadhaar cards would be taken to task.

The sorry state of affairs regarding the ambitious Aadhaar card scheme is rooted in the previous UPA government's apathy to give statutory status to the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI). It also did not pay heed to the recommendations of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance, which had raised serious questions over the functioning of UIDAI and also concerns expressed by its own Finance and Home Ministries.

The need for conferring statutory authority to the UIDAI was felt by the government in November 2008. However, it was deferred for over two years. The Ministry of Planning had informed the committee that all crucial matters impinging on security and confidentiality of information will be covered by relevant laws until the time Parliament passes the National Identification Authority of India (NIDAI) Bill. The Bill, which has been pending in Parliament since 2010, has not been cleared.

In 2013, the Supreme Court had directed that no person should suffer for not getting the card, though some authorities had issued a circular making it mandatory. About 750 million Aadhaar numbers have been generated and about Rs 8,000 crore spent to make these cards, that too without Parliament's sanction.