In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

8752 - Digital tools vs analogue mind - Live Mint

Last Modified: Fri, Sep 25 2015. 01 29 AM IST


It may be a good idea for the government to think of investing in a manner that ensures that the existing system works and, to make them work, use all possible digital tools

Osama Manzar

Even in the era of digitization and e-governance and automation, our mindset is the same as before. Photo: Priyanka Parashar/Mint

We are a country where we love hardware more than software. Let me explain. Whenever there is a need to construct a building—whether an office, panchayat bhavan, community centre, health centre, anganwadi, school or even a toilet—where there is a chance of tendering involving the purchase of things, we are extremely quick and efficient. Perhaps that allows money to change hands and keep the pockets warm of people who are at the helm of things.

But we fail comprehensively when it comes to matters such as how to use such infrastructure, how to integrate it with software, how to train human resources to manage and run the infrastructure and how to monitor them either by automation software or by applied systems.

Go to any government building, whether in a town or a village, and you will see that the building was sanctioned and built quite quickly and inaugurated with pomp by a minister or a political celebrity. But their upkeep and usage is always in question. We lack either in hiring the right people or right number of people and, even if we have adequate human resources, they are not trained, not motivated and do not have a sense of responsibility or accountability. We have developed a great system of looking at each and every occasion of spending public money as an opportunity to use the situation to benefit ourselves without committing to work.

I was travelling recently across various parts of the hinterland. I got tired of taking pictures of diverse government infrastructure, imposing, non-imposing, dilapidated, unmaintained, closed, locked, partly opened, manned by sleeping men and often unmanned. And the situation is not only with brick-and-mortar stuff, but also with digital stuff. In government schools, there are hundreds and thousands of computers lying unused, never opened, and in a majority of the places, especially in Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Odisha and Uttar Pradesh, completely untouched.

Asking the school kids and teachers would reveal that either the school does not have computer teachers or the principal does not allow computers to be switched on because they fear that if something goes wrong with the computers, they may be held accountable. It is better, therefore, for the school staff to send in reports, month after month, that the computers or digital equipment are working fine.

Go next door to the panchayat bhavan; almost every one of them has been given computers and printers, but the entire digital infrastructure is kept clean, unused and beautifully covered by a colourful towel. Many of the panchayats have Internet connections, mostly through Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL), but visit any of the Internet users in a village and you will find them complaining that their Internet connection has been mostly down.

Taking our own example, wherever we are working across 60 plus districts, and if we have a BSNL connection, we end up having non-working connectivity, and are pushed to using dongles for Internet access.

Moreover, in some places, we also provide Internet connectivity as a community service, and all those who were using BSNL have shifted to our community connectivity because of its reliability.

These days, the government has built Atal Seva Kendras (ASK); I am talking about the ones in Rajasthan, which earlier used to be named after Rajiv Gandhi. The ASK buildings have three rooms—a computer room, a village councillor room and a meeting room. The entire building is solar-powered. I would like to invite all of you to please visit and tell me how many of them you find open or working or used or functional.

The question is, why did we spend so much money for new buildings if panchayat buildings were already in existence and why not spend money on making sure that the buildings are used, monitored for usage and there is a real-time update of their efficacy?

Last week, I was in Telangana, where they use Photoshop for editing Aadhaar cards. If you have an Aadhaar card and you are still not old enough to avail pension or post-retirement entitlements, don’t worry, the local fixer is fully digitally enabled. They will scan your Aadhaar card and change your age in Photoshop so that you can apply for all those entitlements.
The question is, why is the entire database of Aadhaar not available to the departments offering entitlements? And who cross-checks eligibility and identity? Are we only interested in buying hardware and not in embedding the necessary process and software and change management training and capacity building?

Go to any of the community health centres in the villages; they look like they haven’t been used for ages. If at all some of them are in use, you will feel that your health will further deteriorate by going to any type of health centres at the panchayat or taluk level because of the poor quality of services available.
Again, we have no hesitation in buying and making infrastructure and putting buildings and equipment in place, but pay no attention to their usage.

The bottomline is that even in the era of digitization and e-governance and automation, our mindset is the same as before. We treat digital tools as pieces of stuff where buying them and budgeting for products are the only important things; making them work, integrating them with the required software and integrating them into a logical intelligence with trained experts are not necessary.

It may be a good idea for the government to think of investing in a manner that ensures that the existing system works and, to make them work, use all possible digital tools.

Osama Manzar is founder-director of Digital Empowerment Foundation and chair of Manthan and mBillionth awards. He serves on the board of World Summit Award and Association of Progressive Communication. He is co-author of NetCh@kra—15 Years of Internet in India & Internet Economy of India.
His Twitter handle is @osamamanzar