In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, September 23, 2015

8737 - RBI to seek clarification from Supreme Court on usage of Aadhaar - Live Mint



The apex court said in an order last month that Aadhaar was neither mandatory nor a condition for accessing benefits one was already entitled to

Saurabh Kumar - Apurva Viswanath

SC has ruled that the Aadhaar number should not be used for any purpose other than PDS and LPG subsidies. Photo: Mint

New Delhi: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is planning to seek a clarification from the Supreme Court on whether banks can use customers’ Aadhaar numbers as an acceptable form of identity.

“RBI is likely to ask the Supreme Court to elaborate on certain parts of the 11 August interim order,” said a lawyer familiar with the matter who declined to be named.

The apex court said in an order last month that Aadhaar was neither mandatory nor a condition for accessing benefits one was already entitled to. It also ordered that the Aadhaar number should not be used for any purpose other than the public distribution scheme and LPG subsidies.

The court was ruling in cases against Aadhaar use that were filed over concerns, including privacy issues.

Interestingly, RBI governor Raghuram Rajan recently advocated the use of Aadhaar saying countries like the US have used unique identification such as social security numbers without violating privacy.

“…It would be sad if its (Aadhaar’s) use were severely restricted. Learning from worldwide experience, we need to see how we can satisfy the concerns of the Supreme Court without undermining the value of the unique ID. The unique ID can enable a variety of economically valuable activities that particularly benefit the bottom of the pyramid,” Rajan said on 18 September.

An email query sent to RBI for a comment on the reported plan to approach the SC remained unanswered.

The view comes at a time when the central bank is planning to beef up the banking network in the country. It has given licences for two universal commercial bank, and in-principle approval for 11 payments banks and 10 small finance banks. Bandhan Bank Ltd, with a universal commercial bank licence, has already started operations.

“As a microfinance institution, we use Aadhaar as an identification because it helps us in identifying duplicate loans. In the future when we become a bank, usage of biometrics will allow us to provide automated services in a much better way,” said Samit Ghosh, chief executive officer and managing director, Ujjivan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, which has won in-principle approval to operate a small finance bank.

“There are many mistakes in other identification cards that we notice,” Ghosh said. He pointed out that using Aadhaar makes the on-boarding process easy and fast as it requires less paperwork, given the online eKYC (know your customer) process.

“For people who are not literate and cannot remember numbers, a biometric authentication for simple automated teller machine transaction will become much easier,” he said.

However, those challenging the validity of the Aadhaar scheme have consistently argued that the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), which issues Aadhaar cards, lacks a sound legal backing and have questioned its authority.

The government also plans to move the SC soon on its ruling restricting the use of Aadhaar as it affects various government initiatives such as biometric attendance, the Jan Dhan Yojana, digital certificates and pension payments. “We have a plan. We have a number of issues, which we are trying to sort before approaching the court,” said a government official of a department that comes under the finance ministry and is involved in the process of moving the Supreme Court.

The official, requesting anonymity, added that the government will address all issues around the use of Aadhaar that have been filed through various cases in the court, including the controversial privacy issue.