In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, September 12, 2015

8685 - Rajasthan plans universal health insurance; 45 million to benefit - Business Standard


After outsourcing primary health care and diagnostic services to private entities, the state plans universal health insurance scheme for treatment at private hospitals
Sahil Makkar  |  New Delhi 

September 11, 2015 Last Updated at 00:38 IST



The Rajasthan government has decided to provide health insurance to the 70 million residents in the state. The move comes after the government's decision to outsource primary health centres and specialised diagnostic services to private players on Public-Private Partnership (PPP) mode.

The Swasthya Bima Yojana scheme is provided under Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje's ambitious Bhamashah programme, through which the state is transferring benefits of its other schemes in the bank accounts of beneficiaries. The insurance scheme is likely to be launched in October.

Bhamashah is somewhat similar to the Union government-run Aadhaar or the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) scheme.

The only difference between the two systems is while the former is for each house-hold in Rajasthan with women being considered head of the family, the latter targets each resident in the country. Both are based on biometric authentication of the beneficiaries.

"The beneficiary of the ins-urance scheme can seek ben-efits between Rs 30,000 and Rs 300,000 in empanelled private hospitals," Rajasthan chief secretary CS Rajan tells Business Standard.

"We expect 70-80 per cent of the state population will benefit from the insurance scheme," adds Rajan.

Last week, the state government signed a memorandum of association with The New India Assurance Company with a rider that the latter cannot make more than 20 per cent profit from the premium paid.

The state government will bear the premium amount for families which are below poverty line and subsidise the rest of the population.

The beneficiaries can seek Rs 30,000 for general illness and Rs 300,000 for critical illness at district level hospitals.

The state officials say the scheme will ensure the poor in far-flung areas get better treatment in private hospitals, resulting in less load on the state hospitals. The Rajasthan government is grappling with shortage of doctors and other medical support staff.


spends 0.98 per cent of gross state domestic product on health as compared to the national average of 1.4 per cent. Similar schemes are operational in the states of Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra. Sme activists see the Rajasthan government's move with an eye of suspicion. They feel the move to benefit private health service providers as the state government has already decided to give 90 primary health centres on public-private partnership mode. The state has also decided to give diagnostic centres, setting up Cancer Care units and IVF centres on PPP mode.

"Introducing an insura-nce-based model of health care would mean compromising and sidelining to a great extent the immensely successful free medicines and free diagnostics schemes already operational in the state," says Chhaya Pachauli, senior programme manager at Rajasthan based non-profit organisation Centre For Health Equity.

"Health insurance schemes leave a lot of scope for patient exploitation and unethical practices especially by private impaneled health facilities. To increase the number of claims, there will be over medication and unnecessary surgical procedures by medical services facilities and patients will be subjected to unwarranted medical risks," she adds.

There have been reports in the past that caesarian sections performed in private medical institutions were far more than required. The activists fear instances where the insured amount would be exhausted quickly and the poor patients to fend for themselves.