In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, February 8, 2018

12886 - Facts belie Jaitley’s Aadhaar claims - The Tribune


Posted at: Feb 6, 2018, 12:04 AM; last updated: Feb 6, 2018, 12:04 AM (IST)

Facts belie Jaitley’s Aadhaar claims

Gopal Krishna


Unlike what is being claimed now, then FM Pranab Mukherjee said nothing about Aadhaar providing identity to Indians when he announced the setting up of UIDAIGopal Krishna
Facts belie Jaitley’s Aadhaar claims

Identity fuss: Aadhaar, its uses and scope have invited much speculation and debate.
Convener of Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties
At paragraph 118 of his Budget Speech, Arun Jaitely, Finance Minister made three claims in four sentences: ``Aadhaar has provided an identity to every Indian. Aadhar has eased the delivery of so many public services to our people. Every enterprise, major or small, also needs a unique ID. The Government will evolve a Scheme to assign every individual enterprise in India a unique ID.''
They do not present a factual picture.
Claim No.1: Aadhaar has provided an identity to every Indian
Fact: Every Indian except 0.03 per cent of the population admittedly had an identity already. This was disclosed in a RTI reply dated April 28, 2015 that only 2.19 lakh residents (0.03 per cent) were given Aadhaar numbers based on the introduction by the introducer system because they did not have a pre-existing identity.
The UIDAI issued the first Aadhaar number to Ranjna Sadashiv Sonwane, a tribal woman from Maharashtra on September 29, 2010. The UIDAI press note had claimed, "Today there are a large number of residents, face challenges in accessing various public benefit programs due to the lack of a clear identity proof. The Aadhaar number will ease these difficulties by providing a nationally valid and verifiable single source of identity proof."
The RTI reply reveals that the claim made by government in its press note of September 2010 and in the Budget speech of 2018-19 remains misleading and glaringly untrue.
While presenting the Union Budget 2009-10, then Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee said the UIDAI was set up to ``establish an online data base with identity and biometric details of Indian residence and provide enrolment and verification services across the country.'' Unlike what is being claimed now, no claim was made about providing identity because Indians already had pre-existing identity.   
In the Budget speech of 2010-11 it is admitted that "CIDR will be handed over to the Managed Service Provider (MSP) on a long term contract basis." CIDR refers to Central Identities Data Repository of biometric UID/Aadhaar numbers. British firm Ernst & Young was given the contract for setting up the CIDR and selection of MSP. The Economic Survey 2011-12 observed, "The Aadhaar project is set to become the largest biometric capture and identification project in the world" even as the UIDAI was "discharging its functions without any legal basis" as per the report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance.  This has been brought to the notice of the Supreme Court's five-judge Constitution Bench hearing the petitions challenging the constitutionality of Aadhaar. 
Claim No.2: Aadhaar has eased the delivery of so many public services to our people.
Fact: The RTI reply proves that that 'an inability to prove identity" was not a major barrier to access benefits and subsidies. The death of several citizens including Aadhaar holders due to denial of public services shows that it has made life difficult for citizens who are facing the cruel denial of their citizens' entitlements due to Aadhaar, a proof of having resided in India for at least 182 days. This is despite the fact that it is not a proof of citizenship. If this trend continues, citizens may be denied the right to vote.
Claim No.3: Every enterprise, major or small, also needs a unique ID. The Government will evolve a Scheme to assign every individual enterprise in India a unique ID.
Fact: The minister did not inform Parliament and the citizens about the conceptual, structural and functional link between UIDAI and goods and services tax network (GSTN) from the very outset. Notably, chief executive officer of UIDAI, A.B. Pandey is also the chairman of GSTN since September 8, 2017. The Aadhaar Act came into force in toto from September 12, 2016 and Central GST Act came into effect on July 1, 2017. The fact is that the Unique ID to which the minister is referring to is mentioned nine times in the Central GST Act, 2017.  Its Section 25 deals with the procedure for registration wherein it is stated that "any other person or class of persons, as may be notified by the Commissioner, shall be granted a Unique Identity Number in such manner and for such purposes, including refund of taxes on the notified supplies of goods or services or both received by them, as may be prescribed. Section 150 (1) (o) also deals with it.
The marriage between biometric surveillance and financial surveillance of citizens seems to be breaching the social contract by making citizens subordinate to alien commercial interests of all shades amidst blitzkrieg of advertisements and misinformation campaigns.