In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, March 14, 2018

12964 - Despite clause, services continue to be denied over Aadhaar - The Hindu


BENGALURU, MARCH 10, 2018 23:10 IST


A major chunk of the denials is in the Public Distribution System
Despite recent reiteration by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) that no essential services or benefits would be denied to genuine beneficiaries for want of Aadhaar, there have been several such cases across the State.

While a major chunk of these denials have been in the Public Distribution System, incidents of denial of pensions, school scholarship, housing scheme, employment under MNREGA, and healthcare have been reported. These make up the 1,300 affidavits that Right to Food Campaign–Karnataka has submitted to the Supreme Court where the case is still pending.

The disconnect
Activists fear that such cases will only increase in the State with passing of the Karnataka Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Bill on February 21 in the Assembly. The Bill does have a no-denial clause, but it does little on the ground, they argue. “The disconnect between the official line and on-ground reality is stark,” said Kshitij Urs, who is part of the campaign.

For instance, according to affidavits, anecdotal assessment has pegged denial of ration on account of Aadhaar-related issues at 40%. Activists claim that a starvation death in Mangaluru in 2017 was due to denial of ration for lack of Aadhaar card.
Mokshamma from Raichur claimed many were being denied ration because of the failure of Aadhaar authentication at the ration shop. “Many times when we go, there is no power at the shop. We do hard labour every day and this often leads to fingerprint mismatch. We also cannot go often to the shop as we risk losing the day’s pay,” she said. “Many new mothers suffer from anaemia and this hampers biometric authentication,” she added.

Toll-free not popular
Despite the Food and Civil Supplies Department opening a toll-free line (1967) to lodge complaints on benefit denial issues, it has not been a popular option among people.

It’s not just ration that is being denied. Sadiya, a class 7 student of a government school in K.R. Market, Bengaluru, has not been receiving scholarship for two years now because of a spelling mistake in her name in her Aadhaar card. “The name is Sadiya, but has been spelt as Saziya. We tried correcting it several times but in vain,” said Taj, the girl’s mother.
Chandrika, a HIV+ person from Bengaluru, said Anti-retroviral Therapy treatment centres across the State have been demanding Aadhaar card to issue medicines, but many patients were concerned that submission of Aadhaar card may lead to disclosal of their identity. “The medicines are not being entirely denied. But until you submit Aadhaar, the centres are issuing medicines for only a week or two weeks, instead of a month,” she said.
Mariyamma, 30, a resident of Hosahalli camp in Raichur, said Aadhaar was made mandatory for employment under MNREGA and she was denied work for almost a year. But why did she delay getting a card? “Initially, they were enrolling us for Aadhaar at the panchayat office, but then they said it is not mandatory; so I neglected to do so. But when they made it mandatory, they had stopped enrolment at the panchayat office. Now we have to go to the nearby town, spend a whole day and pay money to get an Aadhaar card. It is difficult to forego a day’s pay to get a card,” she said.
UIDAI statement

A statement the UIDAI released on February 10 had said that such service and benefit denials were punishable under the laws of the land. “Under no circumstance can anyone be denied a service just because he/she doesn’t have an Aadhaar. If one does not have Aadhaar or if Aadhaar online verification is not successful due to some reason, the agency or department has to provide the service using alternative means of identification and recording them in exception registers,” it said.