In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, December 10, 2010

934 - UID can help create a national disability registry' - Deccan Herald

Friday 10 December 2010 



Mohammad Asif Iqbal’s exclusion in school at a young age due to visual impairment perhaps made him determined to fight for an inclusive society.

 Having lost eye sight completely at the age of 16 due to a genetic factor, this 34-year-old is currently part of the country’s ambitious Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) project after having taken a year-long sabbatical from his job as senior consultant at Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC). His task: to make sure that the disabled community is able to enroll in UID. And to do this, he has been touring the country to create awareness and hold workshops with NGOs who would encourage and bring disabled people under the UIDAI gambit.

Iqbal did his schooling in the US and completed his college degree in commerce from Kolkata. He did his MBA from Symbiosis, Pune, and became the first blind student to have passed from the institute. Kolkata-based Iqbal spoke to Rashmi Menon of Deccan Herald about his plans to make UIDAI accessible to the disabled.

What prompted you to take a sabbatical from your job to work in UIDAI?

Earlier this year, I attended a conference organised by Nasscom in Kolkata, where UIDAI director general R S Sharma had given a talk. After the talk I approached him and expressed my desire to be part of the project. He introduced me to Raju Rajagopal who handles civil society outreach section and was invited for a meeting where I met Nandan Nilekani. Once they accepted my proposal, I spoke to my boss in PwC, who in turn spoke to the head of PwC and I was given permission to take the sabbatical. So, I will draw salary from PwC, while I am working in the UID project.

How do you plan to make UID disabled friendly?

My role is to make sure that the disabled community is not excluded from the UID project. So, my first priority is to ensure that the UID website and Adhaar manuals and documents are disabled friendly. I am visiting NGOs for inputs and also lobbying with UID’s head office in New Delhi to get more work done. I will also hold sensitisation session for registrars in state governments and enrollment agencies. For instance, if a disabled person comes for registration and if the biometric fails to register, the registrar would tell them to come later. We are going to explain to them that there are policies that are clearly laid out that if one biometric doesn’t work then the others should be used.

I am also conducting workshop for NGOs and disability groups on ways to enroll different categories of disability and benefits of having UID. The hope is that once they are convinced, they will create awareness and many more disabled people will come forward to register.

How are you going about making the websites and manuals disabled friendly?

I am reaching out to various networks of disabled groups about their feedback and conference with vendors and lobbying with the New Delhi office on how to resolve the problems and whether to outsource the work. So it is a huge challenge working with the government; but so far so good. Patience is the name of the game and it will happen.

How will the UID benefit a disabled  person?

One of the main problems a disabled person faces is producing a lot of documents — ration card, pan card, etc — to get disability certificate for railway concession. While the UID will not resolve all the problems, it intends to create a platform wherein the future dialogues with the railways, health or social welfare ministries will pave the way for them to store the UID numbers in their databases. Once the authentication process is in place, the hassle of producing multiple documents every time could be spared. There will be no question of rejection of applications or harassment of a disabled person.

What are your observations about the government’s role in making the processes disabled friendly?

Actually, the government does a lot for the disabled community but still it somehow does not reach the beneficiaries. I believe that funds are not an issue but it’s not being properly utilised. So, while the government tries to ease processes by conducting camps for disability certificates and other documents, the exclusion still remains. For instance, there are around 3 lakh disabled people eligible for disabled pension in West Bengal. However, the government budget is just for 8,000 people. This gives rise to people using reference to get into the quota list.

Can UID help create a national disability registry?

Absolutely. It is definitely one of the future benefits one can perceive from UID. Once disabled people have registered for UID, NGOs and disabled groups will have to lobby with state governments to create a national registry. A mechanism could be set up where the government can create a national registry with the UID numbers that will show not only the number of disabled people but also the different types of disabilities. But again, the UID is just a platform and it is the job of the state governments to push for a common registry.